Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="hong" data-source="post: 806072" data-attributes="member: 537">First, I don't have a major problem with super-expensive items. You pays the money, you gets your powerup. Alternatively, if you DO have a problem with super-expensive items, I've already pointed you to the place in the rulebooks where such items are disallowed. If you wish to continue arguing with yourself, feel free to ignore this.There is a column labelled "total sacrifice required" in Table 2-2 on p.21. Perhaps I misread this column and instead of gold, it's referring to virgin sacrifices or something. I have heard that many virgins play D&D, so it makes sense.Or maybe chicken sacrifices. I have also heard that many D&D players like choking chickens, so again it makes sense.To, I dunno, make it more consistent with the rest of the item creation guidelines, perhaps?What? Displacement is displacement. It grants a 50% concealment miss chance. The cost of this, if from a cloak of major displacement, is a flat 50,000 gp, or 100,000 gp from an unslotted item. There is absolutely no reason why a 50% miss chance should cost any different just because it derives from a magic weapon as opposed to some other item. The game mechanical benefit is the same, hence the cost should be the same.I think this paragraph of yours is stuck in neutral or something.Are you arguing with yourself again?Not, of course, that there's anything wrong with arguing with yourself. Why, I am "arguing with myself" RIGHT NOW, IYKIWMAIYTD.</blockquote>

Verification