Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sandboxes? Forked from Paizo reinvents hexcrawling
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Shaman" data-source="post: 5129482" data-attributes="member: 26473"><p>Relatively few people in the real world have the personality to be assassins, or pit fighters, or holy warriors, or make deals with demons in exchange for supernatural power, but they readily assume these roles in roleplaying games.</p><p></p><p>How is assuming the role of a proactive adventure-seeker any different?That's actually my point: most adventurers aren't looking for 9-5 jobs, so in the games I run that means they should be actively looking for adventure, stirring the pot, making contacts, gathering intelligence.</p><p></p><p>The spoon-feeding part is, in my humble opnion, simple conditioning. It was not always thus, and it need not be so everafter. If more referees stop spoon-feeding their players, if more players assume greater responsibility for what happens in the game, I think you'd see a sea-change in how published adventures are written.Well, railroading the first session or two and forcing things to reach a conclusion are pretty significant differences.</p><p></p><p>But those differences asde, perhaps the key difference is none of what I'm putting out to the players are "hooks." There's no 'line' attached, no adventure path or series of linked encounters to follow, no BBEG encounter to be "forced" in for a "satisfying" conclusion.</p><p></p><p>In planning my game, I begin with a beginning, and then I full-stop. I don't give much thought to what happens next, because I prefer to take my cues from the adventurers. Their choices, leavened by fate in the form of dice rolls, make up the game.</p><p></p><p>For example, let's say the adventurers in <a href="http://www.obsidianportal.com/campaigns/le-ballet-de-l-acier" target="_blank"><em>Le Ballet . . .</em></a> take a stroll on the Pont-Neuf. I'll decribe the basic setting -the merchants and their stalls, the actors busking, beggars, well-dressed bourgeoisie and nobles strolling in their finery, the archers of the provost-marshal on patrol, students in their gowns expounding on some point of theology in Latin, the shouting bargemen from the river below the bridge. And then I'll roll for random encounters: maybe it's a beautiful noblewoman and her maidservant, or a pickpocket masquerading as a beggar, or students from rival fencing fraternities trading insults and looking fierce. I'll throw in a random reaction roll should the adventurers interact with any of these, to guide me on the npcs' behavior.</p><p></p><p>And that's where I stop. Everything else follows from what the adventurers choose to pursue. I don't prepare plots for the adventurers to chase; I assess the consequences of the adventurers' actions, and the world responds accordingly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Shaman, post: 5129482, member: 26473"] Relatively few people in the real world have the personality to be assassins, or pit fighters, or holy warriors, or make deals with demons in exchange for supernatural power, but they readily assume these roles in roleplaying games. How is assuming the role of a proactive adventure-seeker any different?That's actually my point: most adventurers aren't looking for 9-5 jobs, so in the games I run that means they should be actively looking for adventure, stirring the pot, making contacts, gathering intelligence. The spoon-feeding part is, in my humble opnion, simple conditioning. It was not always thus, and it need not be so everafter. If more referees stop spoon-feeding their players, if more players assume greater responsibility for what happens in the game, I think you'd see a sea-change in how published adventures are written.Well, railroading the first session or two and forcing things to reach a conclusion are pretty significant differences. But those differences asde, perhaps the key difference is none of what I'm putting out to the players are "hooks." There's no 'line' attached, no adventure path or series of linked encounters to follow, no BBEG encounter to be "forced" in for a "satisfying" conclusion. In planning my game, I begin with a beginning, and then I full-stop. I don't give much thought to what happens next, because I prefer to take my cues from the adventurers. Their choices, leavened by fate in the form of dice rolls, make up the game. For example, let's say the adventurers in [url=http://www.obsidianportal.com/campaigns/le-ballet-de-l-acier][i]Le Ballet . . .[/i][/url] take a stroll on the Pont-Neuf. I'll decribe the basic setting -the merchants and their stalls, the actors busking, beggars, well-dressed bourgeoisie and nobles strolling in their finery, the archers of the provost-marshal on patrol, students in their gowns expounding on some point of theology in Latin, the shouting bargemen from the river below the bridge. And then I'll roll for random encounters: maybe it's a beautiful noblewoman and her maidservant, or a pickpocket masquerading as a beggar, or students from rival fencing fraternities trading insults and looking fierce. I'll throw in a random reaction roll should the adventurers interact with any of these, to guide me on the npcs' behavior. And that's where I stop. Everything else follows from what the adventurers choose to pursue. I don't prepare plots for the adventurers to chase; I assess the consequences of the adventurers' actions, and the world responds accordingly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sandboxes? Forked from Paizo reinvents hexcrawling
Top