Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Sarah Silverman leads class-action lawsuit against ChatGPT creator
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RareBreed" data-source="post: 9091135" data-attributes="member: 6945590"><p>Sure, like I said, it's how the text is used that matters the most. Which is why I gave the example of memorizing a play. Perfectly fine to just have it in your head, but once you start giving performances or narrating books, then that's another story.</p><p></p><p>Plagiarism and copyright violations are little more difficult to nail down. I was just <a href="https://info.deeplearning.ai/ai-cancer-diagnosis-advances-chatbots-work-the-drive-thru-chatgpt-racks-up-server-fees-image-generators-get-an-upgrade" target="_blank">reading a post</a> from deeplearning.ai where Andrew Ng (the cofounder of cousera and the aforementioned site) often posts some ML related information. Andrew talked about the possibility of certain models "understanding" the problem they are solving. He starts off by saying "understanding" is as thorny of an issue as consciousness, and is more of a philosophical question, but nevertheless, he talks about some research done on Othello-GPT; an LLM trained on Othello moves...and only the moves of Othello. In fact, the LLM wasn't even told it was learning anything about Othello.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I hope more investigation and research goes into this, because if true, I think we need to look at LLM's with a different lens.</p><p></p><p>I actually have an argument on the Pro-Creator side. The problem with AI having memorized corpus of text, videos or other "information" is how easy it is to be disseminated by it. Of course one can make the argument that the AI still needs to be connected to the internet, and that humans have this same possibility. The problem for a human is the amount of time it would take to transfer the knowledge from brain to computer (ie, type out the text). But, once done, would be as trivial for a human as an AI.</p><p></p><p>Of course, we already have legal protections in place for humans not to do that, eg pirate material. So I think it's a weak Pro-Creator argument, but still one that should be addressed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RareBreed, post: 9091135, member: 6945590"] Sure, like I said, it's how the text is used that matters the most. Which is why I gave the example of memorizing a play. Perfectly fine to just have it in your head, but once you start giving performances or narrating books, then that's another story. Plagiarism and copyright violations are little more difficult to nail down. I was just [URL='https://info.deeplearning.ai/ai-cancer-diagnosis-advances-chatbots-work-the-drive-thru-chatgpt-racks-up-server-fees-image-generators-get-an-upgrade']reading a post[/URL] from deeplearning.ai where Andrew Ng (the cofounder of cousera and the aforementioned site) often posts some ML related information. Andrew talked about the possibility of certain models "understanding" the problem they are solving. He starts off by saying "understanding" is as thorny of an issue as consciousness, and is more of a philosophical question, but nevertheless, he talks about some research done on Othello-GPT; an LLM trained on Othello moves...and only the moves of Othello. In fact, the LLM wasn't even told it was learning anything about Othello. I hope more investigation and research goes into this, because if true, I think we need to look at LLM's with a different lens. I actually have an argument on the Pro-Creator side. The problem with AI having memorized corpus of text, videos or other "information" is how easy it is to be disseminated by it. Of course one can make the argument that the AI still needs to be connected to the internet, and that humans have this same possibility. The problem for a human is the amount of time it would take to transfer the knowledge from brain to computer (ie, type out the text). But, once done, would be as trivial for a human as an AI. Of course, we already have legal protections in place for humans not to do that, eg pirate material. So I think it's a weak Pro-Creator argument, but still one that should be addressed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Sarah Silverman leads class-action lawsuit against ChatGPT creator
Top