Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Sarah Silverman leads class-action lawsuit against ChatGPT creator
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Reynard" data-source="post: 9148707" data-attributes="member: 467"><p>Look, I absolutely believe that copyrighted works should be opt in for training AI, but I am constantly cringing at how poorly people understand the methodology and what happens in the algorithm. Especially, but not limited to, older creators.</p><p></p><p>It isn't a collage machine. It doesn't take chunks of your art or text or code and insert it into a new thing. That is not how it works. It is a blind algorithm trained to decide what follows the previous thing based on specified prompts. That could be an adjacent pixel or the next word in s sentence or a following line of code.</p><p></p><p>The reason you see near or exact reproductions is that some sources are pervasive in the dataset. The most popular example is the second paragraph of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's (Philosopher's) Stone: it shows up because a HUGE number of reviews of that book include the first couple paragraphs. Put in the 756th paragraph and you won't get anything like the 757th.</p><p></p><p>I think it is important to protect intellectual property. And I think it is important to support, pay and uplift artists of all kinds. But I also think this kind of generative AI is ultimately a tool akin to the camera and will, in the end, create far more human developed art than it destroys.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Reynard, post: 9148707, member: 467"] Look, I absolutely believe that copyrighted works should be opt in for training AI, but I am constantly cringing at how poorly people understand the methodology and what happens in the algorithm. Especially, but not limited to, older creators. It isn't a collage machine. It doesn't take chunks of your art or text or code and insert it into a new thing. That is not how it works. It is a blind algorithm trained to decide what follows the previous thing based on specified prompts. That could be an adjacent pixel or the next word in s sentence or a following line of code. The reason you see near or exact reproductions is that some sources are pervasive in the dataset. The most popular example is the second paragraph of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's (Philosopher's) Stone: it shows up because a HUGE number of reviews of that book include the first couple paragraphs. Put in the 756th paragraph and you won't get anything like the 757th. I think it is important to protect intellectual property. And I think it is important to support, pay and uplift artists of all kinds. But I also think this kind of generative AI is ultimately a tool akin to the camera and will, in the end, create far more human developed art than it destroys. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Sarah Silverman leads class-action lawsuit against ChatGPT creator
Top