Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
SAS D20 -- A disappointed view
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="whisper_jeff" data-source="post: 313815" data-attributes="member: 6370"><p>Is there a chance we will see the whole BESM system being sold in d20 form? I for one would spend my hard earned military pay on such products! Oh ya, SAS d20 is awesome.</p><p>-----</p><p> Currently there are no plans to do one but we are still firmly in the "evaluating the results" stage of SAS d20. We do have plans to do some more d20 products but for lines that make sense as traditional d20 products (it'll all become clear when we announce them - sorry I'm being so cryptic...) but BESM is not one that automatically screams out for d20 treatment. That said, if SAS d20 does very well, we would be foolish to not deliver what the fans want. For now, however, we are watching and evaluating.</p><p></p><p>-----</p><p>When you put the d20 logo on a product, you are implying a certain level of compatability and/or familiarity with it. If you don't deliver that, what is really going on? You are just milking the d20 customer base in the hopes that the d20 logo will sell the "toe in the SRD" version of your game where your own version of the game didn't sell. The way I see it, if you didn't want the compatability and familiarity that the logo implies, there was no reason not to buy the TriStat version in the first place... unless you hate TriStat or something.</p><p>-----</p><p> That iplies that SAS d20 is not compatible with other d20 products. I would say that it is compatible. It isn't _effortlessly_ compatible - it does require a smidge of work and the book points out how to make the adjustments in virtually every instance that the GM/player needs to think about such things, but it most certainly is compatible. Heck, with about ten minutes of work (if that) I could drop Sentinel or Red Phoenix into a traditional d20 game. They wouldn't be "D&D" characters (they still wouldn't have Feats or spell-like abilities), but I could easily use them without any problem or issue. SAS d20 _is_ compatible with other d20 products. Some may wish to disagree (and some surely will), but I feel the amount of work required to use SAS with a traditional d20 game is so insignificant that it is not worth considering.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="whisper_jeff, post: 313815, member: 6370"] Is there a chance we will see the whole BESM system being sold in d20 form? I for one would spend my hard earned military pay on such products! Oh ya, SAS d20 is awesome. ----- Currently there are no plans to do one but we are still firmly in the "evaluating the results" stage of SAS d20. We do have plans to do some more d20 products but for lines that make sense as traditional d20 products (it'll all become clear when we announce them - sorry I'm being so cryptic...) but BESM is not one that automatically screams out for d20 treatment. That said, if SAS d20 does very well, we would be foolish to not deliver what the fans want. For now, however, we are watching and evaluating. ----- When you put the d20 logo on a product, you are implying a certain level of compatability and/or familiarity with it. If you don't deliver that, what is really going on? You are just milking the d20 customer base in the hopes that the d20 logo will sell the "toe in the SRD" version of your game where your own version of the game didn't sell. The way I see it, if you didn't want the compatability and familiarity that the logo implies, there was no reason not to buy the TriStat version in the first place... unless you hate TriStat or something. ----- That iplies that SAS d20 is not compatible with other d20 products. I would say that it is compatible. It isn't _effortlessly_ compatible - it does require a smidge of work and the book points out how to make the adjustments in virtually every instance that the GM/player needs to think about such things, but it most certainly is compatible. Heck, with about ten minutes of work (if that) I could drop Sentinel or Red Phoenix into a traditional d20 game. They wouldn't be "D&D" characters (they still wouldn't have Feats or spell-like abilities), but I could easily use them without any problem or issue. SAS d20 _is_ compatible with other d20 products. Some may wish to disagree (and some surely will), but I feel the amount of work required to use SAS with a traditional d20 game is so insignificant that it is not worth considering. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
SAS D20 -- A disappointed view
Top