Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Save My Game - Goes off like a bomb!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ourph" data-source="post: 3452453" data-attributes="member: 20239"><p>Mr. Nelson-Brown seems to be convicting this DM on pretty thin evidence. Why does he assume that the DM boxed these players into a situation where the only alternative was to guess what he was thinking? He suggests two possible alternatives to finding the trigger (use spells to get through the door, find an alternate means of opening the lock) and assumes that the DM is negating those routes. Why not assume that the players really are uncreative, as the DM is suggesting, and that they simply haven't considered those options.</p><p></p><p>If I found myself in the same situation as a player and didn't want to spend an hour figuring out which piece of furniture to move in order to get the door open I'd definitely be thinking the following....</p><p></p><p>1. Use some alternate means of getting through the door. (Knock)</p><p>2. Use some alternate means of figuring out how to open the door (Divination spells, capture a creature from the surrounding area that might know the secret)</p><p>3. Remove the door (take off the hinges, chop through it with an axe)</p><p>4. Bypass the door (find an alternate route)</p><p>5. Ignore the door (go do something else, perhaps come back to the door when I have more appropriate spells or information)</p><p></p><p>Not to Godwin the thread or anything, but it seems to me that, whatever the DM may be doing wrong (and I'm admitting the possibility the DM is at fault), the players are also at fault here, primarily of treating an RPG like a video-game. In most video-games, you can either go forward or quit playing. If there's a door in a room, you usually have to go through the door to keep playing the game. That's not true in an RPG. You can go up, down, sideways. You can even pick a completely different objective to pursue. If the players are playing D&D, but acting like they are playing Super Mario Brothers, it's probably not entirely the DM's fault.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ourph, post: 3452453, member: 20239"] Mr. Nelson-Brown seems to be convicting this DM on pretty thin evidence. Why does he assume that the DM boxed these players into a situation where the only alternative was to guess what he was thinking? He suggests two possible alternatives to finding the trigger (use spells to get through the door, find an alternate means of opening the lock) and assumes that the DM is negating those routes. Why not assume that the players really are uncreative, as the DM is suggesting, and that they simply haven't considered those options. If I found myself in the same situation as a player and didn't want to spend an hour figuring out which piece of furniture to move in order to get the door open I'd definitely be thinking the following.... 1. Use some alternate means of getting through the door. (Knock) 2. Use some alternate means of figuring out how to open the door (Divination spells, capture a creature from the surrounding area that might know the secret) 3. Remove the door (take off the hinges, chop through it with an axe) 4. Bypass the door (find an alternate route) 5. Ignore the door (go do something else, perhaps come back to the door when I have more appropriate spells or information) Not to Godwin the thread or anything, but it seems to me that, whatever the DM may be doing wrong (and I'm admitting the possibility the DM is at fault), the players are also at fault here, primarily of treating an RPG like a video-game. In most video-games, you can either go forward or quit playing. If there's a door in a room, you usually have to go through the door to keep playing the game. That's not true in an RPG. You can go up, down, sideways. You can even pick a completely different objective to pursue. If the players are playing D&D, but acting like they are playing Super Mario Brothers, it's probably not entirely the DM's fault. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Save My Game - Goes off like a bomb!
Top