Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Orlax" data-source="post: 6754913" data-attributes="member: 6801305">Nah that's not that arrogant, we play a fairly complex game that does in fact require a decent intelligence.  I'm used to home games where you just ask the DM if a book or a specific option within a book is fair game.  I for the most part get what's going on here I just dislike the inconsistency of the ruling especially given what the purpose of the ruling is.The reason for keeping the supplements separate is to avoid unforeseen and unbalanced combinations.  The fact of the matter is that wizard's get to completely circumvent that aim.  It literally puts wizard's into s higher tier of capability than everyone else because they can combine their class options (that's what spells are to a wizard, class features) from every single book that every gets published, while other players can't ever cross supplements.  It is decidedly unfair.I definitely understand the too many cooks issues they face up there in the admin layer, and I really don't expect them to listen to me, like I said I know I'm fairly inconsequential, and that it's not my game, but I figure it didn't hurt to point out obvious exploits of their system, and where they have failed to notice a system fix that they should let stand in an evergreen manner (seriously green flame Blade should have been in the PHB).</blockquote>