Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Scaling of attacks and defenses.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Majoru Oakheart" data-source="post: 5920931" data-attributes="member: 5143"><p>Well, one of their goals appears to be that monsters are useful at a much higher range of levels. One of the examples was that a couple of Orcs might be a challenge for 1st level characters, but a 10th level character might still be afraid of 40 Orcs.</p><p></p><p>The only way to accomplish this is to make it so that attacks and defenses over the course of 10 levels don't significantly increase.</p><p></p><p>Let's assume defenses NEVER increase and that Orcs have the same chance of hitting you at level 10 as they do at level 1(This also makes armor extremely valuable). You'll have approximately 5 times more hitpoints than you did at 1st level. So, in order to take on 10 times as many Orcs with about the same difficulty, you do need to defeat them faster. We do that with a slight increase in attack accuracy and a large increase in damage.</p><p></p><p>They have a 12 AC. The precon Fighter gets +6 to hit at 1st level. So, ideally, if you are still going to fight them at 10th level, your bonus to hit can't be so high that you hit them every time, or the battle becomes pointless.</p><p></p><p>So, let's assume you've acquired a +2 weapon by then. That brings your attack up to +8. I would think you couldn't have more than a +2 from leveling at 10th level. That way fighters hit on a 2. Meanwhile, the rest of the group might only have gotten +1 in 10 levels requiring a 4 to hit.</p><p></p><p>If you get more bonuses than 1 or 2 over the course of 10 levels, then low level monsters quickly scale away so quickly, they can't be used anymore.</p><p></p><p>The more I look at it, the more I think that +1 to hit every 5 levels for Fighters(Also Fighter-like classes such as Paladin and Wizards with spells) and +1 to hit every 10 levels for everyone else looks around right for scaling.</p><p></p><p>This means that at level 20, the difference in attack bonuses goes something like this:</p><p></p><p>Fighter +13</p><p>Wizard with spells +13</p><p>Paladin +12</p><p>Cleric with spells +12</p><p>Rogue with melee +10</p><p>Cleric with melee +9</p><p>Wizard with melee +6</p><p></p><p>The highest AC PCs appear to be able to have is 21. I would guess the same is true of monsters, and that most of the level 20 monsters will have ACs in the 19-23 range.</p><p></p><p>This puts them firmly in the suicidal range for most 1st level characters. Even a 1st level Fighter with +6 to hit isn't going to be able to defeat something with 350 hitpoints and an AC of 22.</p><p></p><p>However, it does allow more "realistic" scenarios where 100 1st level Fighters attack the monster and manage to do enough damage to kill it.</p><p></p><p>One 20th level Fighter being approximately the equivalent of 100 1st level Fighters seems about the right increase in power to me.</p><p></p><p>Then again, it's also possible they remove ALL attack bonus scaling...but since magic weapons still add to hit and damage, they become way more powerful than levels are. A level 1 fighter with a +5 sword might be the equivalent of a level 10 fighter in terms of damage output. Although, that would work to explain why magic weapons aren't bought or sold. If anyone who acquires a magic weapon suddenly has the power of a legion of warriors, they'd be priceless.</p><p></p><p>Although, it appears they are going for roughly parity in terms of how much your skill(+2 for proficiency, +1 for being a Fighter) and stat(They appear to be assuming +3 for everyone's prime stats) affect combat.</p><p></p><p>I would guess that in order to maintain that parity, they'd have to add a third pillar of "experience" and make it so you didn't gain more than about +3 due to levels.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Majoru Oakheart, post: 5920931, member: 5143"] Well, one of their goals appears to be that monsters are useful at a much higher range of levels. One of the examples was that a couple of Orcs might be a challenge for 1st level characters, but a 10th level character might still be afraid of 40 Orcs. The only way to accomplish this is to make it so that attacks and defenses over the course of 10 levels don't significantly increase. Let's assume defenses NEVER increase and that Orcs have the same chance of hitting you at level 10 as they do at level 1(This also makes armor extremely valuable). You'll have approximately 5 times more hitpoints than you did at 1st level. So, in order to take on 10 times as many Orcs with about the same difficulty, you do need to defeat them faster. We do that with a slight increase in attack accuracy and a large increase in damage. They have a 12 AC. The precon Fighter gets +6 to hit at 1st level. So, ideally, if you are still going to fight them at 10th level, your bonus to hit can't be so high that you hit them every time, or the battle becomes pointless. So, let's assume you've acquired a +2 weapon by then. That brings your attack up to +8. I would think you couldn't have more than a +2 from leveling at 10th level. That way fighters hit on a 2. Meanwhile, the rest of the group might only have gotten +1 in 10 levels requiring a 4 to hit. If you get more bonuses than 1 or 2 over the course of 10 levels, then low level monsters quickly scale away so quickly, they can't be used anymore. The more I look at it, the more I think that +1 to hit every 5 levels for Fighters(Also Fighter-like classes such as Paladin and Wizards with spells) and +1 to hit every 10 levels for everyone else looks around right for scaling. This means that at level 20, the difference in attack bonuses goes something like this: Fighter +13 Wizard with spells +13 Paladin +12 Cleric with spells +12 Rogue with melee +10 Cleric with melee +9 Wizard with melee +6 The highest AC PCs appear to be able to have is 21. I would guess the same is true of monsters, and that most of the level 20 monsters will have ACs in the 19-23 range. This puts them firmly in the suicidal range for most 1st level characters. Even a 1st level Fighter with +6 to hit isn't going to be able to defeat something with 350 hitpoints and an AC of 22. However, it does allow more "realistic" scenarios where 100 1st level Fighters attack the monster and manage to do enough damage to kill it. One 20th level Fighter being approximately the equivalent of 100 1st level Fighters seems about the right increase in power to me. Then again, it's also possible they remove ALL attack bonus scaling...but since magic weapons still add to hit and damage, they become way more powerful than levels are. A level 1 fighter with a +5 sword might be the equivalent of a level 10 fighter in terms of damage output. Although, that would work to explain why magic weapons aren't bought or sold. If anyone who acquires a magic weapon suddenly has the power of a legion of warriors, they'd be priceless. Although, it appears they are going for roughly parity in terms of how much your skill(+2 for proficiency, +1 for being a Fighter) and stat(They appear to be assuming +3 for everyone's prime stats) affect combat. I would guess that in order to maintain that parity, they'd have to add a third pillar of "experience" and make it so you didn't gain more than about +3 due to levels. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Scaling of attacks and defenses.
Top