Scans of Dragonlance 3e

[Artimoff]

Here is the link...

http://www.gamingreport.com/modules...x&req=ShowFile&file_wrap=html/dragonlance.htm



What do you all think?

 

[darkbard]

well, the art is less than stellar.

 

[Zweischneid]

well, the art is less than stellar.

But better then 3.5.

 

[shoplifter]

THe art fits the design of the book VERY well IMO. Its really grown on me since I picked it up.

 

[Artimoff]

Does anyone think that the dryad was removed from the 3.5MM because she's a entaur now?

And I thought that Centaurs of Krynn refused to wear clothing of any kind. No one told Larry.

 

[LivesForPain]

I kind of like the art direction. As said above I like it better than the stuff in the 3.5 books. Or what I've seen so far at least.

 

[kreynolds]

Wow. Some of it I like...some of it I don't. The first two and the last (the dragon) are slick. The map's good also. Nice work on that. I also like the color of the header text. It's a little more green that what's in the D&D books. Just slightly different, but still eyepopping.

 

[Praeco]

I didn't think the art shown was that bad, though it is definitely is not great. The text seems extremely readable. I didn't like that map though. It looks too sterile, I would prefer one with more... literary atmosphere, I guess. I like maps that look like they belong on the shelf of an old cartographer or wizard.

 

[Remathilis]

Does anyone have the preview of the DL mystic class available?

 

[Zarrock God of Evil]

Could be better - but some of the pictures are quite "distinctive" in their feel and I like them...

-Zarrock