Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Scholar Character Class
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tomn" data-source="post: 5733453" data-attributes="member: 97218"><p>Okay, so here's my explanation of these things. If you still think that it would be better another way after I've explained, then please say so</p><p></p><p>First off, the table is actually two tables. This was just stupid formatting issues. Sorry. One of the tables relates your result to bonuses, and the other relates your knowledge skill to creature types.</p><p></p><p>Normally I would group them that way, too. However, I wanted each knowledge skill to have at least one creature type to go along with it. Also, consider the balance issues. With the suggested assignments, who would take the planes over, say, nature? These assignments make perfect sense, and I agree with them, but if they were used for the class then it would discourage the selection of some skills. I would like to have all of the knowledge skills be valid choices.</p><p></p><p>As for the whole thing about psionics... I'm not sure I understand you. Even though "psionic" isn't a type of creature per se, I thought that it would make sense to go with that knowledge skill. Also, there aren't too many psionic creatures anyways, so it doesn't seem too unbalanced.</p><p></p><p>About the spells... My idea was to have a class that could function as either a good caster, or a good fighter, but not both. I based both the BAB and the spell progression off of the bard. The Applied Studies class feature is supposed to pull the Scholar up to speed in one of the areas. Also; the area that Applied Studies applies to can only be selected once, at first level. Sorry if the wording was unclear. My hope was for the scholar to be almost as good as other classes in his area (dps, tank, caster) most of the time, then be a bit better than them when fighting creatures of his specialized type.</p><p></p><p>The fighter bonus feats (or the spells, depending on which you choose) are there so that the class can be a bit more flexible. The idea was that a scholar focusing on spellcasting would use them for spells, while a scholar focusing on mundane fighting would use them for feats.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Thanks for the criticism! If you still think that I need to address one of these issues, then let me know. I'll change things that people think need to be changed, as long as they know why I had them that way in the first place.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tomn, post: 5733453, member: 97218"] Okay, so here's my explanation of these things. If you still think that it would be better another way after I've explained, then please say so First off, the table is actually two tables. This was just stupid formatting issues. Sorry. One of the tables relates your result to bonuses, and the other relates your knowledge skill to creature types. Normally I would group them that way, too. However, I wanted each knowledge skill to have at least one creature type to go along with it. Also, consider the balance issues. With the suggested assignments, who would take the planes over, say, nature? These assignments make perfect sense, and I agree with them, but if they were used for the class then it would discourage the selection of some skills. I would like to have all of the knowledge skills be valid choices. As for the whole thing about psionics... I'm not sure I understand you. Even though "psionic" isn't a type of creature per se, I thought that it would make sense to go with that knowledge skill. Also, there aren't too many psionic creatures anyways, so it doesn't seem too unbalanced. About the spells... My idea was to have a class that could function as either a good caster, or a good fighter, but not both. I based both the BAB and the spell progression off of the bard. The Applied Studies class feature is supposed to pull the Scholar up to speed in one of the areas. Also; the area that Applied Studies applies to can only be selected once, at first level. Sorry if the wording was unclear. My hope was for the scholar to be almost as good as other classes in his area (dps, tank, caster) most of the time, then be a bit better than them when fighting creatures of his specialized type. The fighter bonus feats (or the spells, depending on which you choose) are there so that the class can be a bit more flexible. The idea was that a scholar focusing on spellcasting would use them for spells, while a scholar focusing on mundane fighting would use them for feats. Thanks for the criticism! If you still think that I need to address one of these issues, then let me know. I'll change things that people think need to be changed, as long as they know why I had them that way in the first place. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Scholar Character Class
Top