Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Sci-Fi Channel finally discusses Farscape’s cancellation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Whodat" data-source="post: 584127" data-attributes="member: 7386"><p>My first reaction after reading this interview was outrage. I have a Nielsen box – and I watched Farscape… every week. Bonnie Hammer thinks that perhaps the people who are signing these online petitions are newcomers who haven’t watched the show when it mattered.</p><p>She is wrong.</p><p></p><p>But it doesn’t matter.</p><p></p><p>I started thinking about what she said. The more I though about it, the more I could see her point of view. </p><p></p><p>As I said, I watched Farscape. Every week. But so too did a lot of my co- workers. So too did friends that I hang out with. The problem isn’t that these people aren’t watching. The problem is that Bonnie Hammer can’t prove that they are watching. She can’t wave a sheet of paper at her advertisers saying, “Look! Millions of Farscape fans! Fork over the dough!” </p><p></p><p>Consider this: Nielsen Media Research is in business to sample a portion of our population, and find out what programs they watch. They compile this information, which is then given to the networks, who now know how much to charge advertisers for their ads. The higher the viewership, the more money networks can charge for ads.</p><p></p><p>The system sounds good on paper. One problem is that it hinges on a company who polls a miniscule portion of the population. Another problem is that there doesn’t seem to be another accepted rating system which anyone could counter her arguments. If Bonnie Hammer’s only source of information is inaccurate, her decisions are going to be woefully wrong.</p><p></p><p>Instead of wasting our time and money in massive online campaigns to save Farscape and Firefly, what we need is a massive online campaign to change the rating system itself. Something which is accessible. Something which samples a larger portion of the viewing audience. Something that can get the networks’ attention if it has to.</p><p></p><p>Think about it. How many times did Joss Whedon have to pitch Buffy the Vampire Slayer before it was finally picked up? The reason? Network executives said to themselves “There’s nothing like this on TV… therefore no one wants to see it.”</p><p></p><p>Networks and advertisers don’t really know how to respond to fan-based petitions. They have been trained to gauge a show’s success by its ratings. So, it doesn’t matter if Bonnie Hammer is wrong. As long as Nielsen is the accepted ratings system real fans cannot be heard.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Whodat, post: 584127, member: 7386"] My first reaction after reading this interview was outrage. I have a Nielsen box – and I watched Farscape… every week. Bonnie Hammer thinks that perhaps the people who are signing these online petitions are newcomers who haven’t watched the show when it mattered. She is wrong. But it doesn’t matter. I started thinking about what she said. The more I though about it, the more I could see her point of view. As I said, I watched Farscape. Every week. But so too did a lot of my co- workers. So too did friends that I hang out with. The problem isn’t that these people aren’t watching. The problem is that Bonnie Hammer can’t prove that they are watching. She can’t wave a sheet of paper at her advertisers saying, “Look! Millions of Farscape fans! Fork over the dough!” Consider this: Nielsen Media Research is in business to sample a portion of our population, and find out what programs they watch. They compile this information, which is then given to the networks, who now know how much to charge advertisers for their ads. The higher the viewership, the more money networks can charge for ads. The system sounds good on paper. One problem is that it hinges on a company who polls a miniscule portion of the population. Another problem is that there doesn’t seem to be another accepted rating system which anyone could counter her arguments. If Bonnie Hammer’s only source of information is inaccurate, her decisions are going to be woefully wrong. Instead of wasting our time and money in massive online campaigns to save Farscape and Firefly, what we need is a massive online campaign to change the rating system itself. Something which is accessible. Something which samples a larger portion of the viewing audience. Something that can get the networks’ attention if it has to. Think about it. How many times did Joss Whedon have to pitch Buffy the Vampire Slayer before it was finally picked up? The reason? Network executives said to themselves “There’s nothing like this on TV… therefore no one wants to see it.” Networks and advertisers don’t really know how to respond to fan-based petitions. They have been trained to gauge a show’s success by its ratings. So, it doesn’t matter if Bonnie Hammer is wrong. As long as Nielsen is the accepted ratings system real fans cannot be heard. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Sci-Fi Channel finally discusses Farscape’s cancellation
Top