Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Science: asteroid vs. hero physics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nagol" data-source="post: 7486132" data-attributes="member: 23935"><p>The problem with dealing with asteroids with a (very) short timeframe is the any asteroid that can harm the denizens of Earth has to have a lot of mass and since you have so little time to react, tremendous forces need to be brought to bear. </p><p></p><p>If you want to keep the time pressure, perhaps you could move the asteroid further out and unless its vector is changed in the next 5 minutes, the impact will be unavoidable? Assuming the answer is no, let's do some back of the envelope math!</p><p></p><p>I'll assume the rock is about 100m in radius and has a density of about 3, that means it masses 12 million tonnes.</p><p></p><p>Because the timeframe is short, you have to adjust the vector by a substantial amount. That mass is moving at quite a clip (~11 km/s). If you have 300 seconds, you're intercepting the asteroid about 3500 km from Earth. Earth has a radius just over 6,000 km. Worst case is a centre strike which would mean you'd need to change its vector by 45 degrees. But let's assume the impact is projected to be a grazing hit about 1000 km from the edge which means you'd need to shift its angle by about 20 degrees. </p><p></p><p>Now that shift needs to be instantaneous. Every second of delay/acceleration means the distance is closing and the angle needs to become more extreme. Vectors at these speeds are mostly additive so you need to impart a velocity of about 3 km/s which would have the rock just skim the atmosphere -- assuming we ignore gravitational attraction. Let's bump that up to 3.5 km/s for a basic safety margin. That change is what you'd need if you could impart it instantly. Let's assume you spend a whole minute of acceleration and thus need to achieve a higher velocity of about 6 km/s to simplify the math. A = v / t so 6km/60 seconds = 100 m/s-squared or about 10 g of acceleration. F = ma, so 12 billion kg x 100 m / s-squared is 1.2 trillion Newtons of force which is the same as 1.2 terawatts needs to be applied for the whole 60 seconds.</p><p></p><p>Regardless of how our hero applies the force -- whether directly to the asteroid threat or through a passive intermediary, the amount of energy remains the same. Since you want the hero to use an intermediary, there needs to be something that acts as a force multiplier. You don't have sufficient time to use the Earth's gravity well so let's look elsewhere.</p><p></p><p>One simple force multiplier would be a secondary large rock -- say a half the radius of the threat that is moving in a different orbit that is closer to the preferential vector that can be adjusted to impact the threat. With a mass of about 10% of the target rock, the energy required to change its vector is equally reduced. If the asteroids are mostly metallic then you could even potentially set up an elastic collision. In an perfect scenario, the larger mass would have its velocity changed by ~5% of the closing velocity between the rocks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nagol, post: 7486132, member: 23935"] The problem with dealing with asteroids with a (very) short timeframe is the any asteroid that can harm the denizens of Earth has to have a lot of mass and since you have so little time to react, tremendous forces need to be brought to bear. If you want to keep the time pressure, perhaps you could move the asteroid further out and unless its vector is changed in the next 5 minutes, the impact will be unavoidable? Assuming the answer is no, let's do some back of the envelope math! I'll assume the rock is about 100m in radius and has a density of about 3, that means it masses 12 million tonnes. Because the timeframe is short, you have to adjust the vector by a substantial amount. That mass is moving at quite a clip (~11 km/s). If you have 300 seconds, you're intercepting the asteroid about 3500 km from Earth. Earth has a radius just over 6,000 km. Worst case is a centre strike which would mean you'd need to change its vector by 45 degrees. But let's assume the impact is projected to be a grazing hit about 1000 km from the edge which means you'd need to shift its angle by about 20 degrees. Now that shift needs to be instantaneous. Every second of delay/acceleration means the distance is closing and the angle needs to become more extreme. Vectors at these speeds are mostly additive so you need to impart a velocity of about 3 km/s which would have the rock just skim the atmosphere -- assuming we ignore gravitational attraction. Let's bump that up to 3.5 km/s for a basic safety margin. That change is what you'd need if you could impart it instantly. Let's assume you spend a whole minute of acceleration and thus need to achieve a higher velocity of about 6 km/s to simplify the math. A = v / t so 6km/60 seconds = 100 m/s-squared or about 10 g of acceleration. F = ma, so 12 billion kg x 100 m / s-squared is 1.2 trillion Newtons of force which is the same as 1.2 terawatts needs to be applied for the whole 60 seconds. Regardless of how our hero applies the force -- whether directly to the asteroid threat or through a passive intermediary, the amount of energy remains the same. Since you want the hero to use an intermediary, there needs to be something that acts as a force multiplier. You don't have sufficient time to use the Earth's gravity well so let's look elsewhere. One simple force multiplier would be a secondary large rock -- say a half the radius of the threat that is moving in a different orbit that is closer to the preferential vector that can be adjusted to impact the threat. With a mass of about 10% of the target rock, the energy required to change its vector is equally reduced. If the asteroids are mostly metallic then you could even potentially set up an elastic collision. In an perfect scenario, the larger mass would have its velocity changed by ~5% of the closing velocity between the rocks. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Science: asteroid vs. hero physics
Top