Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Science Fantasy and D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheCosmicKid" data-source="post: 6936796" data-attributes="member: 6683613"><p>Okay, got it. And setting aside my own opinion of solipsistic and consensus-reality premises (that it would be a real shame if reality were limited to what we can imagine, because encountering that which we <em>couldn't</em> have imagined is so much more interesting), what you're describing is still a set of rules governing how reality works. They're different rules than the ones currently understood by science, but science isn't exactly a stranger to the notion of overturning the going theories. If you tell a scientist, "You don't actually need electricity to turn on a lightbulb, you need enough people to believe it will turn on", do they stop being a scientist? Or do they just start <em>doing science</em> on this new and powerful phenomenon you've shown them -- how many people do you need to turn on the lightbulb? are more distant people less effective? and so on. It's a profound paradigm shift, to be sure, but is it really so different in kind from the paradigm shift between Newton and Einstein? We don't feel any need to call relativistic physics "magic" just because they represent a deeper understanding of reality than Newtonian "science". It's science all the way down, Mr. Russell.</p><p></p><p>A consensus-reality setting also underscores my other issue about the equivalence between magic and psionics. The world hinges on the interaction between the mind and the world, after all. You could scratch out the words "magic" and "mage", pencil in the words "psionics" and "psion", and have a setting a lot of people would consider pure SF -- some of that trippy and conceptual SF, to be sure, but still SF.</p><p></p><p>So I suppose what I'm asking in a roundabout way is: what elements actually put the "fantasy" in "science fantasy"? What distinguishes it from science fiction?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheCosmicKid, post: 6936796, member: 6683613"] Okay, got it. And setting aside my own opinion of solipsistic and consensus-reality premises (that it would be a real shame if reality were limited to what we can imagine, because encountering that which we [I]couldn't[/I] have imagined is so much more interesting), what you're describing is still a set of rules governing how reality works. They're different rules than the ones currently understood by science, but science isn't exactly a stranger to the notion of overturning the going theories. If you tell a scientist, "You don't actually need electricity to turn on a lightbulb, you need enough people to believe it will turn on", do they stop being a scientist? Or do they just start [I]doing science[/I] on this new and powerful phenomenon you've shown them -- how many people do you need to turn on the lightbulb? are more distant people less effective? and so on. It's a profound paradigm shift, to be sure, but is it really so different in kind from the paradigm shift between Newton and Einstein? We don't feel any need to call relativistic physics "magic" just because they represent a deeper understanding of reality than Newtonian "science". It's science all the way down, Mr. Russell. A consensus-reality setting also underscores my other issue about the equivalence between magic and psionics. The world hinges on the interaction between the mind and the world, after all. You could scratch out the words "magic" and "mage", pencil in the words "psionics" and "psion", and have a setting a lot of people would consider pure SF -- some of that trippy and conceptual SF, to be sure, but still SF. So I suppose what I'm asking in a roundabout way is: what elements actually put the "fantasy" in "science fantasy"? What distinguishes it from science fiction? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Science Fantasy and D&D
Top