Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Kai Lord" data-source="post: 779126" data-attributes="member: 3570">Whether WAR was considered in-house or not is irrelevant, though you are indeed correct on his relationship with WOTC; the point was simply that WOTC used to pay to put to put the likes of WAR, Lockwood, Brom, Sweet, and Wood in each of their top tier products, and now they don't.  Hence the deterioration to a more cost effective look that obviously doesn't bother everyone.And for the record, it doesn't even "bother" me, I just won't spend money if the sum of a product's parts don't equal a satisfying whole.  Its possible for a product to meet such a standard with less than impressive art, but very, very rare.</blockquote>