Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Scrolls in 5e; loving this!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Snoring Rock" data-source="post: 6686793" data-attributes="member: 78325"><p><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'"><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-size: 12px">I suppose this is my on-going saga of discovery in 5</span>[SUP]<span style="font-size: 10px">th</span>[/SUP]<span style="font-size: 12px">edition D&D. My group just started acampaign using the system. We are comingover from Castles and Crusades. I haveplayed AD&D, 3.x, Pathfinder and C&C. C&C is a great system that feels old-school but lacks a little love by its creators. The books are chockfull of every typo, spelling error, rules contradictions and/or errata possible. </span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'"><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-size: 12px">Anyway, that is not the reason for this post. I am quite pleased with the simplicity built into the rules for 5</span>[SUP]<span style="font-size: 10px">th</span>[/SUP]<span style="font-size: 12px"> edition. Let’s take the missing ”read magic” spell as an example of down-sizing he rules. I saw that right away butfigured I would understand why later as we played. The party found a scroll in a treasure I had placed in the dungeon. It was wizard spell. There are no wizards in the party, just a cleric and warlock for casters. When it came time to use the scroll, all of the heads at the table popped down to read the PHB to see if a warlock could cast a spell off of a scroll writtenby a wizard.</span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: #000000">It actually took us a while to figure it out. We had such a strong assumption engrained in us from past systems that we were sure there had to be a check or feat or some other mojo. It is too simple. Anyone who can read can attempt to read and cast the spell. It requires an intelligence check with a base 10 DC. Since only casers are more proficient with those checks, it appears thatit is a bit of a risk for non-casters to try. At low level, even casters can goof it up. </span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'"><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="color: #000000">So each caster class has its own way of obtaining andcasting, but anyone can use a scroll. Gone are the days of keeping track of who wrote the scroll and if you havea treasure with specific type of spell, and it becoming useless to the party if they do not have the specific type of caster.</span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'"><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-size: 12px">I like this system so far, of course the party just made I tto 2</span>[SUP]<span style="font-size: 10px">nd</span>[/SUP]<span style="font-size: 12px"> level. More to come… </span></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Snoring Rock, post: 6686793, member: 78325"] [FONT=Calibri][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=3]I suppose this is my on-going saga of discovery in 5[/SIZE][SUP][SIZE=2]th[/SIZE][/SUP][SIZE=3]edition D&D. My group just started acampaign using the system. We are comingover from Castles and Crusades. I haveplayed AD&D, 3.x, Pathfinder and C&C. C&C is a great system that feels old-school but lacks a little love by its creators. The books are chockfull of every typo, spelling error, rules contradictions and/or errata possible. [/SIZE][/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Calibri][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=3]Anyway, that is not the reason for this post. I am quite pleased with the simplicity built into the rules for 5[/SIZE][SUP][SIZE=2]th[/SIZE][/SUP][SIZE=3] edition. Let’s take the missing ”read magic” spell as an example of down-sizing he rules. I saw that right away butfigured I would understand why later as we played. The party found a scroll in a treasure I had placed in the dungeon. It was wizard spell. There are no wizards in the party, just a cleric and warlock for casters. When it came time to use the scroll, all of the heads at the table popped down to read the PHB to see if a warlock could cast a spell off of a scroll writtenby a wizard.[/SIZE][/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Calibri][SIZE=3][COLOR=#000000]It actually took us a while to figure it out. We had such a strong assumption engrained in us from past systems that we were sure there had to be a check or feat or some other mojo. It is too simple. Anyone who can read can attempt to read and cast the spell. It requires an intelligence check with a base 10 DC. Since only casers are more proficient with those checks, it appears thatit is a bit of a risk for non-casters to try. At low level, even casters can goof it up. [/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Calibri][SIZE=3][COLOR=#000000]So each caster class has its own way of obtaining andcasting, but anyone can use a scroll. Gone are the days of keeping track of who wrote the scroll and if you havea treasure with specific type of spell, and it becoming useless to the party if they do not have the specific type of caster.[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Calibri][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=3]I like this system so far, of course the party just made I tto 2[/SIZE][SUP][SIZE=2]nd[/SIZE][/SUP][SIZE=3] level. More to come… [/SIZE][/COLOR][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Scrolls in 5e; loving this!
Top