Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Search Skill and Taking 20:House Rule, no taking 20 on search checks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TKDB" data-source="post: 5878276" data-attributes="member: 6690697"><p>I'm not sure I see the problem with taking 20 on Search checks; if you're willing to spend two solid in-game minutes scouring every last nook and cranny of a 5-ft cube (assuming it's on a wall or corner) space, that seems like a reasonable enough tradeoff for a maximized search check. The take-20 rule was practically made just for Search checks -- it's certainly the case where taking 20 is most commonly applicable.</p><p></p><p>If you want something to be hidden from casual view, but easy to discover if you're looking for something that's out of place, put it within range of a search check taking 10. If you want it to definitely be within the party's capability to find but requiring a bit more effort, put it between the take-10 and take-20 result (including aid another bonuses if you want to add a little more difficulty). If you want it to be definitively outside of the party's capability to find with their current resources, set the DC above the take-20 result (including aid another bonuses).</p><p></p><p>Seems like a reasonable system to me. The only reason I could see for wanting to disallow taking 20 on search checks would be if you wanted to add uncertainty as to whether the party could find the thing or not. But is that really necessary? Why would you even want that in the first place?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TKDB, post: 5878276, member: 6690697"] I'm not sure I see the problem with taking 20 on Search checks; if you're willing to spend two solid in-game minutes scouring every last nook and cranny of a 5-ft cube (assuming it's on a wall or corner) space, that seems like a reasonable enough tradeoff for a maximized search check. The take-20 rule was practically made just for Search checks -- it's certainly the case where taking 20 is most commonly applicable. If you want something to be hidden from casual view, but easy to discover if you're looking for something that's out of place, put it within range of a search check taking 10. If you want it to definitely be within the party's capability to find but requiring a bit more effort, put it between the take-10 and take-20 result (including aid another bonuses if you want to add a little more difficulty). If you want it to be definitively outside of the party's capability to find with their current resources, set the DC above the take-20 result (including aid another bonuses). Seems like a reasonable system to me. The only reason I could see for wanting to disallow taking 20 on search checks would be if you wanted to add uncertainty as to whether the party could find the thing or not. But is that really necessary? Why would you even want that in the first place? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Search Skill and Taking 20:House Rule, no taking 20 on search checks
Top