Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Search Skill and Taking 20:House Rule, no taking 20 on search checks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="imaria" data-source="post: 5880403" data-attributes="member: 75805"><p>With the advent of computer rollers, I'm tempted to outlaw taking 20 in favour of having a computer spit out a list of 20 (or more) d20 rolls, and asking them how long they search. If they look for 10 time intervals, I'll look and see if any of the first 10 rolls are a success. If they want to "take 20", they get 20 rolls, made instantly. Or 30 or 60, if they want. But it takes the certainty of "I definitely got a 20" out of the equation. As anyone who has played D&D long enough knows, you can absolutely roll a d20 20 times and never get a natural 20. Since computer rolling makes it totally possible to roll a d20 100 times with no issue, I'd prefer that.</p><p></p><p>I don't mind PCs taking 20 when they would have been rolling the dice... They'd obviously know when they succeeded anyway, like on a craft skill. But taking 20 on a DM-rolled check takes the uncertainty out of a system that requires risk and suspense for entertainment value.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="imaria, post: 5880403, member: 75805"] With the advent of computer rollers, I'm tempted to outlaw taking 20 in favour of having a computer spit out a list of 20 (or more) d20 rolls, and asking them how long they search. If they look for 10 time intervals, I'll look and see if any of the first 10 rolls are a success. If they want to "take 20", they get 20 rolls, made instantly. Or 30 or 60, if they want. But it takes the certainty of "I definitely got a 20" out of the equation. As anyone who has played D&D long enough knows, you can absolutely roll a d20 20 times and never get a natural 20. Since computer rolling makes it totally possible to roll a d20 100 times with no issue, I'd prefer that. I don't mind PCs taking 20 when they would have been rolling the dice... They'd obviously know when they succeeded anyway, like on a craft skill. But taking 20 on a DM-rolled check takes the uncertainty out of a system that requires risk and suspense for entertainment value. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Search Skill and Taking 20:House Rule, no taking 20 on search checks
Top