Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Bullgrit" data-source="post: 5588883" data-attributes="member: 31216">Very interesting concept. (I can't give you xp yet.)Just to correct this characterization: I did not complain; I said they weren't my style. Nothing to complain about -- I wasn't forced to run or play them.And of the modules I listed as not liking, (ToH, WPM, and DL), I think only ToH was originally a tournament module. But, having said that, I will admit to also not liking very much the Slavelords series, which were all originally tournament modules. You might have an correct observation, though.Someone check me on this: am I seeing something that's not really there, or does it seem that most people who self-identify as &quot;Old School&quot; generally like *everything* from the early D&amp;D era? Am I the only one who experienced the early era who admits to disliking parts of it? (The parts I liked, I've embraced in products from later eras.)Is the rule: Old School -- gotta love it all! ?Bullgrit</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Bullgrit, post: 5588883, member: 31216"] Very interesting concept. (I can't give you xp yet.) Just to correct this characterization: I did not complain; I said they weren't my style. Nothing to complain about -- I wasn't forced to run or play them. And of the modules I listed as not liking, (ToH, WPM, and DL), I think only ToH was originally a tournament module. But, having said that, I will admit to also not liking very much the Slavelords series, which were all originally tournament modules. You might have an correct observation, though. Someone check me on this: am I seeing something that's not really there, or does it seem that most people who self-identify as "Old School" generally like *everything* from the early D&D era? Am I the only one who experienced the early era who admits to disliking parts of it? (The parts I liked, I've embraced in products from later eras.) Is the rule: Old School -- gotta love it all! ? Bullgrit [/QUOTE]

Verification