Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Connorsrpg" data-source="post: 6352425" data-attributes="member: 19265">Yep...I did open the can worms.I can see both points of views. I do not like the rule as written (and it clearly is ambiguous). I do not like it.And whilst  [MENTION=6778085]Chocolategravy[/MENTION] 's frustrations may seem a little aggressive, I understand his point and it was one I was trying to make.So resting a second hour does not trigger another 2nd Wind, but fighting your way through three pirate ships does if you rest again? So you can only recover lost hps from a fight earlier in the day by 'doing more activity'. Seems ridiculous to me too. (I refrain from using the bag of rats analogy, but I can see where it came from).I too am sure this was not the 'intention' of the rule, BUT it is oddly written in my mind... by the byplay here it is clearly not clear! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />I was going to count any rest (that is not extended) as a short rest, but again, that goes against the above situation? I don't think fighters should be banking healing (at all in my mind actually), but I was willing to give this thing a go...but it is so confusing.I seriously think I might just limit this to Fighters above 1/2 hps. (And yes, there is a quote in the rules about under half you are showing physical signs - cuts and bruises - which don't just go away).We generally play a grittier style and it will be unlikely we will be full-healing over night either. I don't mind the temp hp option either, but I think just restricting above 1/2 hps makes as much sense.There are going to be SO MANY house rules on this one. Obviously everyone likes a different game style here and that is fine, I just wish the actual rule was clearer.</blockquote>

Verification