Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Secret Doors are too secret. Thoughts?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="delericho" data-source="post: 4316920" data-attributes="member: 22424"><p>The method I like is as follows:</p><p></p><p>1) When designing the encounter, the area is split up into key areas by the designer. Perhaps "the walls" are one area, "the desk" is another, and "the painting" is a third. The areas should be fairly broad - "the painting" would include the frame and the wall behind the painting as well, for example.</p><p></p><p>2) If there's anything hidden in an area, the designer determines whether it can be found by a casual search, or if it needs a detailed search. He also sets a DC for the Search.</p><p></p><p>3) When PCs enter the area, they have to declare where they are searching (which area), and also whether it's a casual or a detailed search. They then make a Search roll - you can take 10 on this roll, but cannot take 20. Additionally, you cannot retry - you either find whatever is hidden, or you do not.</p><p></p><p>A casual search takes 1 minute for each area. It is possible to perform this check without touching the item, so does not expose the character to traps/poison on the area in question. However, a casual search has no chance of finding something that requires a detailed search to find.</p><p></p><p>A detailed search takes 5 minutes for each area. It is not possible to perform this check without touching the items, so a failed search will expose the character to any traps/poison on the item (a successful check finds these dangers just in time). A detailed search automatically finds anything that only requires a casual search to find.</p><p></p><p>Example:</p><p></p><p>The baron's study contains his desk and chair, a bookshelf containing many books, several tapestries on the West wall, and a large painted map on the North wall. There is a secret door behind the map, a trapped secret drawer in the desk, and a secret door triggered by one of the books in the bookshelf.</p><p></p><p>The designer divides the room into five areas: the walls (including the door), the map, the tapestries, the furniture and the bookshelf. Detecting the secret door behind the map requires a detailed search of that area (DC 25). Finding the secret drawer requires a casual search of the furninture (DC 20), but finding the trap requires a detailed search (DC 30). Finding the secret door in the bookshelf requires only a casual search (DC 25).</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>This method gives the players some control over where they're searching, but it avoids the need to spend an age searching an area square by square (especially pointless if they're just going to take 20). It eliminates automatic success on searches, and it also means that a detailed search (sometimes required) is not without an element of risk.</p><p></p><p>I also think a passive Perception defence is a good thing, but more for the purpose of spotting ambushes and the like, rather than spotting 'secret' doors and traps. IMO, of course.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="delericho, post: 4316920, member: 22424"] The method I like is as follows: 1) When designing the encounter, the area is split up into key areas by the designer. Perhaps "the walls" are one area, "the desk" is another, and "the painting" is a third. The areas should be fairly broad - "the painting" would include the frame and the wall behind the painting as well, for example. 2) If there's anything hidden in an area, the designer determines whether it can be found by a casual search, or if it needs a detailed search. He also sets a DC for the Search. 3) When PCs enter the area, they have to declare where they are searching (which area), and also whether it's a casual or a detailed search. They then make a Search roll - you can take 10 on this roll, but cannot take 20. Additionally, you cannot retry - you either find whatever is hidden, or you do not. A casual search takes 1 minute for each area. It is possible to perform this check without touching the item, so does not expose the character to traps/poison on the area in question. However, a casual search has no chance of finding something that requires a detailed search to find. A detailed search takes 5 minutes for each area. It is not possible to perform this check without touching the items, so a failed search will expose the character to any traps/poison on the item (a successful check finds these dangers just in time). A detailed search automatically finds anything that only requires a casual search to find. Example: The baron's study contains his desk and chair, a bookshelf containing many books, several tapestries on the West wall, and a large painted map on the North wall. There is a secret door behind the map, a trapped secret drawer in the desk, and a secret door triggered by one of the books in the bookshelf. The designer divides the room into five areas: the walls (including the door), the map, the tapestries, the furniture and the bookshelf. Detecting the secret door behind the map requires a detailed search of that area (DC 25). Finding the secret drawer requires a casual search of the furninture (DC 20), but finding the trap requires a detailed search (DC 30). Finding the secret door in the bookshelf requires only a casual search (DC 25). --- This method gives the players some control over where they're searching, but it avoids the need to spend an age searching an area square by square (especially pointless if they're just going to take 20). It eliminates automatic success on searches, and it also means that a detailed search (sometimes required) is not without an element of risk. I also think a passive Perception defence is a good thing, but more for the purpose of spotting ambushes and the like, rather than spotting 'secret' doors and traps. IMO, of course. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Secret Doors are too secret. Thoughts?
Top