Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Secrets of Xen'drik -- who has it?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hellcow" data-source="post: 2952306" data-attributes="member: 15800"><p>I CERTAINLY advocate your right to do whatever you want in your campaign, and firmly believe that the material presented in books should never prevent you from taking the world in a new direction.</p><p></p><p>At the same time, as the person who wrote both the kalashtar/Inspired material in the ECS and in Races of Eberron, I can say with some confidence that RoE does not ignore the ECS. From the very beginning, the point of the Path of Light has been to guide Dal Quor into its new age. The struggle of the kalashtar has always been one of spiritual warfare. And the Inspired's actions in Sarlona – the slow spread of Inspired control, establishing a monolithic state where creative thought is minimized – has always been tied to the principle "as below, so above"… that stagnation in Eberron would result in a stable Dal Quor. </p><p></p><p>This may not be entirely CLEAR in the ECS; one of the most common complaints I heard about the ECS was that people didn't get the kalashtar, and one of the most common compliments I've had about RoE is that readers now understand what they are about. Still, the ECS had minimal room for Quori material. If you took your game in another drection, that's great. But RoE didn't <em>ignore</em> the material presented in the ECS; it clarified and expanded upon it. </p><p></p><p></p><p>First off, I'd say that if you want "an abiding, evil, ancient beyond all imagining and with a grudge to bear against the (creature type) and all Eberron", you've just described the Lords of Dust. They ARE the eternal, primal evil – the shadow that remains from the dawn of Eberron, still holds its grudge against dragon and couatl, and waits for the day when its full power will be unleashed once more. </p><p></p><p>Second, I'll point out that with the time differential, the current subjective age of the Dreaming Dark is approximately 370,000 years old… older by far than any existing civilization on Eberron, including that of the dragons (as their war with the rakshasa ended approximately 100,000 years ago). Dal Quor has always been a realm of powerful, iconic forces, and it always will be. Throughout human history, that force has been il-Lashtavar, the Darkness that Dreams. If the kalashtar succeed in their struggle, it will eventually be transformed into il-Yannah, the Great Light… and they believe this will in turn herald a new age of light for Eberron.</p><p></p><p>So on the one hand, you have the Lords of Dust, the native, eternal evil of Eberron itself. On the other, you have Xoriat, a realm of terror whose lords wish to corrupt and destroy Eberron and leave its shattered husk in their wake. And on the gripping hand you have the Dreaming Dark, a malevolent force that has been present throughout the rise of human, elven, and goblin civilization. It is ancient, but alone of these three, it is a force that <em>could</em> be unseated (according to kalashtar belief, at least). And the secret to that victory may lie in the past. </p><p></p><p>The key to the turning of the age is that it is the defining point of the struggle between kalashtar and Inspired. It means that the Quori of the Dreaming Dark are in their own view engaged in a struggle for the survival of their entire culture; that while to humans they may appear as pure evil, in their eyes that are simply fighting to survive, as all creatures must. This is one of the things that gives the Quori the unswerving loyalty to their cause often lacking among fiends. It makes them slightly more complex villains than the Order of the Emerald Claw – yes, they're evil, but what would YOU do in their place? </p><p></p><p>It also means that the QUORI don't know what secrets lie in Xen'drik – that there can be artifacts hidden in Xen'drik that have great value to <em>them</em>, things they can't create on their own because they were not present for that war and do not know what forces were brought to bear. I like this both as a limitation on Quori omnipotence and as a place where PCs can potentially fight agents of the Dark openly. As I run them, in Khorvaire, 99% of the time you'll never realize you were engaged in a conflict with the Dreaming Dark; in Xen'drik they don't need to be quite so secretive.</p><p></p><p>Again, I respect that you use them in a different way, and I encourage you to continue doing so. I'm sorry you don't care for our approach. However, as the person who wrote the Quori/Dal Quor/Inspired/Kalashtar material in the ECS, Races of Eberron, the Player's Guide to Eberron, and the Dreaming Dark novels, I beg to differ with the statement that these latter books ignore the ECS.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hellcow, post: 2952306, member: 15800"] I CERTAINLY advocate your right to do whatever you want in your campaign, and firmly believe that the material presented in books should never prevent you from taking the world in a new direction. At the same time, as the person who wrote both the kalashtar/Inspired material in the ECS and in Races of Eberron, I can say with some confidence that RoE does not ignore the ECS. From the very beginning, the point of the Path of Light has been to guide Dal Quor into its new age. The struggle of the kalashtar has always been one of spiritual warfare. And the Inspired's actions in Sarlona – the slow spread of Inspired control, establishing a monolithic state where creative thought is minimized – has always been tied to the principle "as below, so above"… that stagnation in Eberron would result in a stable Dal Quor. This may not be entirely CLEAR in the ECS; one of the most common complaints I heard about the ECS was that people didn't get the kalashtar, and one of the most common compliments I've had about RoE is that readers now understand what they are about. Still, the ECS had minimal room for Quori material. If you took your game in another drection, that's great. But RoE didn't [i]ignore[/i] the material presented in the ECS; it clarified and expanded upon it. First off, I'd say that if you want "an abiding, evil, ancient beyond all imagining and with a grudge to bear against the (creature type) and all Eberron", you've just described the Lords of Dust. They ARE the eternal, primal evil – the shadow that remains from the dawn of Eberron, still holds its grudge against dragon and couatl, and waits for the day when its full power will be unleashed once more. Second, I'll point out that with the time differential, the current subjective age of the Dreaming Dark is approximately 370,000 years old… older by far than any existing civilization on Eberron, including that of the dragons (as their war with the rakshasa ended approximately 100,000 years ago). Dal Quor has always been a realm of powerful, iconic forces, and it always will be. Throughout human history, that force has been il-Lashtavar, the Darkness that Dreams. If the kalashtar succeed in their struggle, it will eventually be transformed into il-Yannah, the Great Light… and they believe this will in turn herald a new age of light for Eberron. So on the one hand, you have the Lords of Dust, the native, eternal evil of Eberron itself. On the other, you have Xoriat, a realm of terror whose lords wish to corrupt and destroy Eberron and leave its shattered husk in their wake. And on the gripping hand you have the Dreaming Dark, a malevolent force that has been present throughout the rise of human, elven, and goblin civilization. It is ancient, but alone of these three, it is a force that [i]could[/i] be unseated (according to kalashtar belief, at least). And the secret to that victory may lie in the past. The key to the turning of the age is that it is the defining point of the struggle between kalashtar and Inspired. It means that the Quori of the Dreaming Dark are in their own view engaged in a struggle for the survival of their entire culture; that while to humans they may appear as pure evil, in their eyes that are simply fighting to survive, as all creatures must. This is one of the things that gives the Quori the unswerving loyalty to their cause often lacking among fiends. It makes them slightly more complex villains than the Order of the Emerald Claw – yes, they're evil, but what would YOU do in their place? It also means that the QUORI don't know what secrets lie in Xen'drik – that there can be artifacts hidden in Xen'drik that have great value to [i]them[/i], things they can't create on their own because they were not present for that war and do not know what forces were brought to bear. I like this both as a limitation on Quori omnipotence and as a place where PCs can potentially fight agents of the Dark openly. As I run them, in Khorvaire, 99% of the time you'll never realize you were engaged in a conflict with the Dreaming Dark; in Xen'drik they don't need to be quite so secretive. Again, I respect that you use them in a different way, and I encourage you to continue doing so. I'm sorry you don't care for our approach. However, as the person who wrote the Quori/Dal Quor/Inspired/Kalashtar material in the ECS, Races of Eberron, the Player's Guide to Eberron, and the Dreaming Dark novels, I beg to differ with the statement that these latter books ignore the ECS. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Secrets of Xen'drik -- who has it?
Top