Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dannyalcatraz" data-source="post: 8082190" data-attributes="member: 19675">In at least one kind of scenario, they're the competition.    Failed contracts means lower market share and damages their ability to charge premium prices.They may also be going after the poor who can’t afford these services, but, of course, that introduces its own problems. Unless we’re talking a full-on dystopia, disappearing poor people is a detectable pattern that could attract law-enforcement attention. Spreading your harvesting targets across demographics obscures the pattern.In addition, there’s the QC issue.  If you’re running an ostensibly higher-tier operation but illegally organleggjng to supply it, you need decent quality parts.  There’s a reason high-end car makers source their leathers from places where barbed wire is illegal- the hides don’t have as many blemishes.  Premium clients aren’t going to want organs harvested from cirrhosis sufferers and people who got every illness that passed through because they couldn’t afford healthcare.  They’re expecting premium parts.  And the competition’s clients are going to be a “herd’ of better quality than average.</blockquote>