W weinerdog First Post Jun 3, 2005 #1 Just currious, Does anyone here have a house rule against using detect magic as a poor mans see invisibility?
Just currious, Does anyone here have a house rule against using detect magic as a poor mans see invisibility?
C Christian Explorer Jun 3, 2005 #2 weinerdog said: Just currious, Does anyone here have a house rule against using detect magic as a poor mans see invisibility? Click to expand... Not I. Hardly seems necessary, given the relative utility of the spells for that purpose ... I played a halfling sorcerer who had to rely on that once; it worked out so well that for my next second-level spell I chose glitterdust.
weinerdog said: Just currious, Does anyone here have a house rule against using detect magic as a poor mans see invisibility? Click to expand... Not I. Hardly seems necessary, given the relative utility of the spells for that purpose ... I played a halfling sorcerer who had to rely on that once; it worked out so well that for my next second-level spell I chose glitterdust.
Voadam Legend Jun 3, 2005 #3 Has never come up IMC, no foe has stayed still for multiple rounds of DM concentration to pinpoint them.
Has never come up IMC, no foe has stayed still for multiple rounds of DM concentration to pinpoint them.
Y yennico First Post Jun 4, 2005 #5 In round thre the invisible assassin killed the wizard who uses the poor man´s see invisible: detect magic with his death attack.
In round thre the invisible assassin killed the wizard who uses the poor man´s see invisible: detect magic with his death attack.
