Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 298981" data-attributes="member: 2011">Unfortunately, this does not answer that specific question, hence, my asking you multiple times.You use the word senses repeatedly here. But, True Seeing only negates one sense. That is the question you are repeatedly avoiding. How does it work on multiple senses when the spell only indicates one sense.True Seeing does not tell you that the man Polymorphed into a Giant has a squeaky little voice as opposed to the bellowing roar you hear. It does not affect the audio portion of that, nor of illusions.You cannot use two different interpretations.Two possibilities:1) You are unaware that True Seeing negated the visual portion of the illusion.This case is identical to a Silence spell on an illusion. The visual portion of the illusion does not exist for you, just like the audio portion of the illusion does not exist for someone in Silence.You do not autosave the rest of the illusion since True Seeing did not inform you of an illusion.2) You are aware that True Seeing negated the visual portion of the illusion.You autosave. Why? Because you are aware of the illusion.Your claim is that possibility #1 is what True Seeing does for you, but that answer #2 (autosave) is the result.Possibility #1 and Answer #2 are mutually exclusive. They are only not mutually exclusive if you can adequately answer the question:Why does True Seeing pierce the entire illusion in your interpretation when it only talks about visual elements in the spell description?If you can give a reasonable answer to this question, you could have a third possibility of:3) You are unaware that True Seeing negated the entire illusion.You autosave. Why? Because none of the illusion exists for you in any way, shape, or form.But again, you have yet to answer that question. Without a reasonable answer to the question, possibility #3 does not exist except as KRs non-substantiated opinion.And, I am quite convinced that you will avoid and try to side step that question yet again. You've done it about four times now. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Well, actually, you only thought you gave a real answer to the question. In reality, you keep avoiding it like the plague.And, since you asked what I wanted, I told you. Only have yourself to blame. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification