Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="kreynolds" data-source="post: 299922" data-attributes="member: 2829">I didn't forget writing that at all. You'll note that I never said that's how I run it. That's how it's been run for me. I even stated so in my following post right after that. I guess you missed it.Of course I can, and I explained it up above.See previous answer.I never went back on it. Pay attention.That's how I run it in my games, yes, though I don't mind #3, but I still don't use it (too many complications involving fellow party members being harmed by an illusionary ogre and me being unable to warn them because I'm not aware of it's existence, and that's just one example).That is how it is run in the game I play in, with my character that has True Seeing, as I stated previously. It's not my fault you overlooked it.I never stated that was my interpretation. Not once. You repeatedly proclaimed that it was my interpretation, but I never said it was. Pitiful.There was nothing to correct, wonderboy. If there was, then you need to go back and correct your posts. You made the claim that it was my interpretation. I didn't.I proclaimed that long before now. In fact, I proclaimed that in my 5th post on this thread.No. You just wasted mine. Pay attention.I agree.What word games? The only word games that I'm aware of are where you repeatedly stated that #3 was my interpretation, when in fact, it never was, as illustrated by my 5th post.See previous answer.Yup. See previous answer.Awesome! You're finally paying attention!I wasn't aware that I made a joke. Perhaps next time you shouldn't make assumptions about what I claim when my earlier posts already suggest otherwise. Now that's funny!Are you kidding? The markup out there is rediculous! That, and with the magic item monopoly they have, not to mention the nasty local Barons, I'll pass on Amn! I played Baldur's Gate II! I know how crummy it is in Amn! Hell, did you know that at one time they banned the use of magic in public without a license! Crazy.Good. You should.Exactly. That's why I handle it that way in my games, because I find it reasonable. I also find #3 reasonable, though it can cause small problems. Actually, not really problems, but more like irritants. Also, it is because I find #3 reasonable that I have been defending it. We never got to how I run it until Anthron suggested that #3 is how I run it, which promted me to correct him. You never asked how I run it (even though I already stated that was how one of my fellow DMs runs it), but it doesn't matter anyway. The point is that I don't have a real problem with #3, and I see it as a valid interpretation, as I have seen it first hand.I know you don't think it's reasonable.I tried. I'll try again later.Whut!? Say, boy! We country folk ain't learned like ya'll!</blockquote>

Verification