Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ScuroNotte" data-source="post: 7312999" data-attributes="member: 6792788">I know many prefer bloodline bonus spells vs increases number known. My reasoning to increase number is that a player may still not be able to create a caster they envision.But more importantly, my point is enforced by the way the spell casters get bonus spells in the PHB.Casters who can change spells, Clerics, Land Druids, and Paladins can change their spells after a long rest and have already a large number known, up to 25 spells. Adding bonus spells that a player doesn't want doesn't matter. A Bard can just choose what spells he/she wants from any class.However, take the warlock who has a fixed number of spells known. That class is offered bonus spells a player can take as an option. If they were forced to take the Patron spells, they would have 5 spells freely to choose from. Not enjoyable.I tried pooling Sorcery Points and Spell Points. The negative is that you regain Sorcery Points after a long rest only. You can homebrew the recovery, but it would still be a low number and that is what I still found frustarting. Arcane Recovery is once per long rest. Separating the points allows you to recover Sorcery Points after each short rest.1. Quickening to cast cantrips for damage2. or Twinning a spell so you can affect 2 creatures you may not normally be allowed to do or Twinning to effect another creature without needing to use a higher spell slot, thus less spell points, is great.If we assume WoTC got the Monk correct with regaining Ki after each short rest, then by separating Sorcery Points from spell slots should allow a Sorcerer regaining them after a short rest be balanced.We have different options for 20th level:Lowering the cost of all metamagics with a cost greater than 2 by 1.Roll initiative and 0 SP, gain 5 SPetc.</blockquote>

Verification