Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Seeker and Rune priest support idea
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Larrin" data-source="post: 5546035" data-attributes="member: 55816"><p>This idea occurred to me in that state between waking and sleeping this morning so i make no claims it is good or bad, just that i had it and it intrigued me.</p><p></p><p>What if, as part of the way they increase support of the seeker and runepriest Wotc did this:</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>That is to say, like slayer is to fighter, seeker is to ranger. After all, what is a seeker but a ranger that went full on primal, and what is a runepriest but a str cleric who won his monastery's spelling bee. This does a number of interesting things for the runepriest and seeker, and perhaps some good things for strength clerics and maybe some worrisome things for the ranger (haven't thought it through to its full extent)</p><p></p><p>1) it increases feat selection for the two 'ignored' classes, giving hopefully reasonable feats to round out their abilities...runepriests should be able to consider their healing runes to be word of healing for these purposes.</p><p></p><p>2) It gives all the involved classes more power choices. In the seeker case it can be accused of make range an "V" (or maybe and 'E' <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":P" title="Stick out tongue :P" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":P" /> ) shaped class, but Wis has always been a rangers friend and if they want to grab some magic-like powers *shrug* . Its also interesting to think about a str cleric taking rune priest powers...some rules would have to make this a reasonable choice</p><p></p><p>3)It decreases the total number of classes, but increases the number of sub-classes. make of this what you wish to.</p><p></p><p>4) It lets support for ranger = support for seeker, it lets rangers benefit from seeker support, in short it makes all support for the classes go just a little bit (or in some cases alot) further.</p><p></p><p>Like I said, I make no claims this is good or bad, but I think its interesting and worth exploring in my own thoughts, and maybe some of y'all will like it too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Larrin, post: 5546035, member: 55816"] This idea occurred to me in that state between waking and sleeping this morning so i make no claims it is good or bad, just that i had it and it intrigued me. What if, as part of the way they increase support of the seeker and runepriest Wotc did this: That is to say, like slayer is to fighter, seeker is to ranger. After all, what is a seeker but a ranger that went full on primal, and what is a runepriest but a str cleric who won his monastery's spelling bee. This does a number of interesting things for the runepriest and seeker, and perhaps some good things for strength clerics and maybe some worrisome things for the ranger (haven't thought it through to its full extent) 1) it increases feat selection for the two 'ignored' classes, giving hopefully reasonable feats to round out their abilities...runepriests should be able to consider their healing runes to be word of healing for these purposes. 2) It gives all the involved classes more power choices. In the seeker case it can be accused of make range an "V" (or maybe and 'E' :P ) shaped class, but Wis has always been a rangers friend and if they want to grab some magic-like powers *shrug* . Its also interesting to think about a str cleric taking rune priest powers...some rules would have to make this a reasonable choice 3)It decreases the total number of classes, but increases the number of sub-classes. make of this what you wish to. 4) It lets support for ranger = support for seeker, it lets rangers benefit from seeker support, in short it makes all support for the classes go just a little bit (or in some cases alot) further. Like I said, I make no claims this is good or bad, but I think its interesting and worth exploring in my own thoughts, and maybe some of y'all will like it too. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Seeker and Rune priest support idea
Top