Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Seeking advice for new 4E game inspired by Pemerton
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 7004222" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>As far as extended rests are concerned, we haven't adopted any official house rule - but in practice I tend to end up regulating them, in my capacity as GM, because I am the one who controls the pacing of events. This becomes particularly straightforward at paragon and epic, where the PCs spend a fair bit of time in places like the Underdark or the Abyss where it's easy to assert that, absent special circumstances, the environment is not conducive to resting.</p><p></p><p>For me, the guiding principle in pacing challenges vs rests is always to keep the pressure and the players sweating - if the PCs have fewer surges left in the party than there are characters, and are facing an above-level challenge so that the players are thinking "How are we going to get ourselves out of this one?", then it's working well. To me, it's not really much like classic AD&D attrition/resource management. It's more like: (i) players have the job of managing resources <em>within</em> encounters, to try and achieve victory; (ii) I have the job of framing them into enough interesting and challenging encounters that they will feel pressured to use their daily resources while not wanting to be profligate with them; and (iii) if I'm doing (ii) properly, than (i) will become more intricate because the players will care not just about encounter but also daily resources.</p><p></p><p>The overall incentive that makes this structure work, at our table, is pretty informal: if the players blow all their resources and then can't handle another encounter or two before resting, they'll look like squibs and I'll make fun of the them! In other words, it's a set of "soft" social dynamics and expectations. Playing with strangers, or in a tournament-style environment, probably some more formal way of rationing extended rests would be necessary - I've never used the 13th Age approach (rest before making it through 4 level-appropriate encounters and you suffer a story setback), but it looks to me like one good way of introducing that formal rationing.</p><p></p><p>This is an interesting point.</p><p></p><p>I think the "therefore" or the "but" can be pretty loose, as long is everyone is on the same page. From the GM's point of view, though, it's easy to see (or, perhaps better, to <em>project</em>) a "therefore" which means nothing to the players because they're not privy to the backstory. Whereas I think if you anchor stuff that happens, and developments that occur, to the PCs - backgrounds, activities, goals, preferences, etc then the players can get into it even if it doesn't really make much sense.</p><p></p><p>That is, I think in a RPG - where the players are able to provide a lot of the drive and direction for events - the "therefore" can be a sort of "meta" therefore and the players will still respond to it. Like <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?490456-Repost-first-session-of-Dark-Sun-campaign&p=7003554&viewfull=1#post7003554" target="_blank">in my most recent Dark Sun session</a>, when the Templar inquisitor tracked down the PCs with a psychic hound (modelled on the X-Men's Rachel Summers): if you look at the events through the lens of a Le Carre-style novel, or even a Raymond Chandler style novel, it's a bit obscure why the inquisitor wants to hunt down the PCs. But from the point of view of the players, (i) they're on the run from the Templars, and (ii) this inquisitor is the (ex-)handler of one of them who (in the PC background) was an assassin in the service of the Templars up until play started at the moment of Sorcerer King Kalek's death, at which point the character decided to break free of the hold his masters had on him.</p><p></p><p>So the "therefore" to the players is much more about the events speaking to the logic and rationale of their characters, then making a fully sensible plot that would work in a mystery story. I think this is a point where the requirements for GMing become a bit different from the requirements for writing; and also where you can get player-driven story-type action without needing to worry too much about "the story" in a bigger picture sense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 7004222, member: 42582"] As far as extended rests are concerned, we haven't adopted any official house rule - but in practice I tend to end up regulating them, in my capacity as GM, because I am the one who controls the pacing of events. This becomes particularly straightforward at paragon and epic, where the PCs spend a fair bit of time in places like the Underdark or the Abyss where it's easy to assert that, absent special circumstances, the environment is not conducive to resting. For me, the guiding principle in pacing challenges vs rests is always to keep the pressure and the players sweating - if the PCs have fewer surges left in the party than there are characters, and are facing an above-level challenge so that the players are thinking "How are we going to get ourselves out of this one?", then it's working well. To me, it's not really much like classic AD&D attrition/resource management. It's more like: (i) players have the job of managing resources [I]within[/I] encounters, to try and achieve victory; (ii) I have the job of framing them into enough interesting and challenging encounters that they will feel pressured to use their daily resources while not wanting to be profligate with them; and (iii) if I'm doing (ii) properly, than (i) will become more intricate because the players will care not just about encounter but also daily resources. The overall incentive that makes this structure work, at our table, is pretty informal: if the players blow all their resources and then can't handle another encounter or two before resting, they'll look like squibs and I'll make fun of the them! In other words, it's a set of "soft" social dynamics and expectations. Playing with strangers, or in a tournament-style environment, probably some more formal way of rationing extended rests would be necessary - I've never used the 13th Age approach (rest before making it through 4 level-appropriate encounters and you suffer a story setback), but it looks to me like one good way of introducing that formal rationing. This is an interesting point. I think the "therefore" or the "but" can be pretty loose, as long is everyone is on the same page. From the GM's point of view, though, it's easy to see (or, perhaps better, to [I]project[/I]) a "therefore" which means nothing to the players because they're not privy to the backstory. Whereas I think if you anchor stuff that happens, and developments that occur, to the PCs - backgrounds, activities, goals, preferences, etc then the players can get into it even if it doesn't really make much sense. That is, I think in a RPG - where the players are able to provide a lot of the drive and direction for events - the "therefore" can be a sort of "meta" therefore and the players will still respond to it. Like [url=http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?490456-Repost-first-session-of-Dark-Sun-campaign&p=7003554&viewfull=1#post7003554]in my most recent Dark Sun session[/url], when the Templar inquisitor tracked down the PCs with a psychic hound (modelled on the X-Men's Rachel Summers): if you look at the events through the lens of a Le Carre-style novel, or even a Raymond Chandler style novel, it's a bit obscure why the inquisitor wants to hunt down the PCs. But from the point of view of the players, (i) they're on the run from the Templars, and (ii) this inquisitor is the (ex-)handler of one of them who (in the PC background) was an assassin in the service of the Templars up until play started at the moment of Sorcerer King Kalek's death, at which point the character decided to break free of the hold his masters had on him. So the "therefore" to the players is much more about the events speaking to the logic and rationale of their characters, then making a fully sensible plot that would work in a mystery story. I think this is a point where the requirements for GMing become a bit different from the requirements for writing; and also where you can get player-driven story-type action without needing to worry too much about "the story" in a bigger picture sense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Seeking advice for new 4E game inspired by Pemerton
Top