Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="HeavyG" data-source="post: 2399894" data-attributes="member: 431">It's funny that many posters in this thread assume that the rogue does more damage than the fighter, but cannot stay in contact with monsters as long and that this is what balances them.I mean, I understand why people say that and that it is the case. It's just that in a game I currently play in (18th level), the party barbarian always does more damage than my rogue in combat, but I'm slightly more durable than him (same AC, he has more 150% of my HPs but I Blink). <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />Of course, that's a barbarian, and not a fighter and the ring does mess things up a little. So it's not funny in the sense of "wrong" or ridiculous as much as funny to me personally. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>