Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Segment Based Combat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="3catcircus" data-source="post: 1500082" data-attributes="member: 16077"><p>I assume you were referring to my post - no? Unfortunately the chart I tried creating came out all discomboobalated and I'm not so good with formatting messageboard messages.</p><p></p><p>Maybe I didn't explain it well enough - you *wouldn't* get 6 actions per round, once you consider weapon speed factors. For example, I'd recommend that wielding a Great-Axe, a Great-Sword, or a Maul would give you a *at least* -4 to initiative. Likewise a dagger wouldn't affect your initiative much at all - therefore, Someone with a Dex 18 (init bonus +4) who wields a dagger *does* get a 5 or 6, but would get only a 2 or better wielding that great-axe. I also didn't make clear that BAB wouldn't reflect the number of attacks you get - that never made any sense to me to begin with. Why should multiple attacks be less effective than the first attack? SO - the maximum number of attacks anyone could ever get would be 6 per round, given a fast weapon and a decent die roll. Additionally, the method I am using guarantees that those with lower initiative will *still* get to act on their segment since they go first on their segment and everyone with higher initiative follows.</p><p></p><p>Lemme try and reformat the table - it'll be the phase followed by what order each person goes on in that segment, based on what their initiative is:</p><p></p><p>6: 6</p><p>5: 5,6</p><p>4: 4,5,6</p><p>3: 3,4,5,6</p><p>2: 2,3,4,5,6</p><p>1: 1,2,3,4,5,6</p><p></p><p>So - hopefully this comes out looking less confusing than my last attempt. Basically, it guarantees that people get to go on their initiative in the segment and not be prevented from doing so by someone with a higher initiative - while still allowing that someone with a higher initiative can still attack first in the round.</p><p></p><p>Hopefully this doesn't confuse anyone further.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="3catcircus, post: 1500082, member: 16077"] I assume you were referring to my post - no? Unfortunately the chart I tried creating came out all discomboobalated and I'm not so good with formatting messageboard messages. Maybe I didn't explain it well enough - you *wouldn't* get 6 actions per round, once you consider weapon speed factors. For example, I'd recommend that wielding a Great-Axe, a Great-Sword, or a Maul would give you a *at least* -4 to initiative. Likewise a dagger wouldn't affect your initiative much at all - therefore, Someone with a Dex 18 (init bonus +4) who wields a dagger *does* get a 5 or 6, but would get only a 2 or better wielding that great-axe. I also didn't make clear that BAB wouldn't reflect the number of attacks you get - that never made any sense to me to begin with. Why should multiple attacks be less effective than the first attack? SO - the maximum number of attacks anyone could ever get would be 6 per round, given a fast weapon and a decent die roll. Additionally, the method I am using guarantees that those with lower initiative will *still* get to act on their segment since they go first on their segment and everyone with higher initiative follows. Lemme try and reformat the table - it'll be the phase followed by what order each person goes on in that segment, based on what their initiative is: 6: 6 5: 5,6 4: 4,5,6 3: 3,4,5,6 2: 2,3,4,5,6 1: 1,2,3,4,5,6 So - hopefully this comes out looking less confusing than my last attempt. Basically, it guarantees that people get to go on their initiative in the segment and not be prevented from doing so by someone with a higher initiative - while still allowing that someone with a higher initiative can still attack first in the round. Hopefully this doesn't confuse anyone further. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Segment Based Combat
Top