Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sell me on 5th…
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 9233469" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>I'm late to the thread but understand you haven't started playing 5e yet. It is one of my favourite editions so I'd like to see you try and hear how it goes. For the record, my favourite editions are BECMI, 3.0 and pre-Tasha 5e, very different from each other <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I do not consider 5e very crunchy.</p><p></p><p>First of all, I find 5e much easier to DM than previous editions, especially if you have a "rules as a toolbox" approach to the game and always keep Rule 0 in mind. If you have a heavy RAW approach to the game and want rules for resolving everything, you are going to encounter troubles when dealing with exploration and stealth, which are purposefully left more open than previous editions.</p><p></p><p>Also from a player's POV the game is lighter than 3e, but it can still be fairly crunchy if you want. The point is that 5e was designed to accommodate both players who want it to be simple and players who want it to be complex. I can't say it succeeded spectacularly, because IMO there aren't many character options that are truly simple beyond low levels, and at the same time there aren't options as complex as in 3e, but the range is fair and most importantly the game doesn't penalise players who choose simple options.</p><p></p><p>On a single character, 5e offers less "building blocks" and dials than 3e, but 3e was probably the most extreme editions with regards to this. 5e tends to offer bigger building blocks with more dramatic effect, think Duplo instead of Lego.</p><p></p><p>Across all characters, 5e offers a much smaller amount of published options than 3e. But because they are bigger options in smaller amount, 5e options actually feel more important.</p><p></p><p>The irony is, that 3e had smaller building blocks because it was meant to be played by people interested in creating their own material (see DMG notes on Prestige Classes) and ended up selling tons of books with ready-made ones because most players rejected homebrew material in favour of "official" one.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That is tricky. 5e offers new concepts since the start, both narratively and mechanically, not necessarily entirely new but at least uncommon or previously non-core. For example Totem Barbarians, Paladins of the Ancients and GOO Warlocks felt quite fresh to me (not saying they were truly new to everyone, but I haven't seen them before myself). Wildshape and Combat Superiority mechanics also felt fairly new to me.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, I don't think 5e makes it easy for you to create novel material by yourself. 3e seems to be a lot easier to break down to numbers, which is probably boring on one hand but makes it easy to create homebrew stuff balanced with the rest. In fact, even official 5e supplementary character material is few and often mechanically repetitive (bonus damage, advantage and extra proficiencies make up for most special abilities).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So 5e offers some of those possibilities already since its core. If you start by choosing a subclass that piques your interests, possibly multiclassing (5e has the best multiclass spellcasters rules if you want) and choosing non-obvious feats, you have the potential to create original characters (I woouldn't give backgrounds much mechanical importance though), but probably can't go very far before you start looking for supplementary books. Even there, I find the amount of available feats and spells still lacking after 10 years.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Such feeling won't be easily overcome. 5e is less concerned with realism than you may like. Certain 5e tenets were chosen for gameplay reasons at the expense of realism, and the proficiencies mechanics is one of them. Another example is the full healing on a long rest. There is no other way around them than to house rule them if you don't like them. But OTOH with 5e being less crunchy, house ruling that kind of thing can be done without fear of having to rebalance other things.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 9233469, member: 1465"] I'm late to the thread but understand you haven't started playing 5e yet. It is one of my favourite editions so I'd like to see you try and hear how it goes. For the record, my favourite editions are BECMI, 3.0 and pre-Tasha 5e, very different from each other :) I do not consider 5e very crunchy. First of all, I find 5e much easier to DM than previous editions, especially if you have a "rules as a toolbox" approach to the game and always keep Rule 0 in mind. If you have a heavy RAW approach to the game and want rules for resolving everything, you are going to encounter troubles when dealing with exploration and stealth, which are purposefully left more open than previous editions. Also from a player's POV the game is lighter than 3e, but it can still be fairly crunchy if you want. The point is that 5e was designed to accommodate both players who want it to be simple and players who want it to be complex. I can't say it succeeded spectacularly, because IMO there aren't many character options that are truly simple beyond low levels, and at the same time there aren't options as complex as in 3e, but the range is fair and most importantly the game doesn't penalise players who choose simple options. On a single character, 5e offers less "building blocks" and dials than 3e, but 3e was probably the most extreme editions with regards to this. 5e tends to offer bigger building blocks with more dramatic effect, think Duplo instead of Lego. Across all characters, 5e offers a much smaller amount of published options than 3e. But because they are bigger options in smaller amount, 5e options actually feel more important. The irony is, that 3e had smaller building blocks because it was meant to be played by people interested in creating their own material (see DMG notes on Prestige Classes) and ended up selling tons of books with ready-made ones because most players rejected homebrew material in favour of "official" one. That is tricky. 5e offers new concepts since the start, both narratively and mechanically, not necessarily entirely new but at least uncommon or previously non-core. For example Totem Barbarians, Paladins of the Ancients and GOO Warlocks felt quite fresh to me (not saying they were truly new to everyone, but I haven't seen them before myself). Wildshape and Combat Superiority mechanics also felt fairly new to me. On the other hand, I don't think 5e makes it easy for you to create novel material by yourself. 3e seems to be a lot easier to break down to numbers, which is probably boring on one hand but makes it easy to create homebrew stuff balanced with the rest. In fact, even official 5e supplementary character material is few and often mechanically repetitive (bonus damage, advantage and extra proficiencies make up for most special abilities). So 5e offers some of those possibilities already since its core. If you start by choosing a subclass that piques your interests, possibly multiclassing (5e has the best multiclass spellcasters rules if you want) and choosing non-obvious feats, you have the potential to create original characters (I woouldn't give backgrounds much mechanical importance though), but probably can't go very far before you start looking for supplementary books. Even there, I find the amount of available feats and spells still lacking after 10 years. Such feeling won't be easily overcome. 5e is less concerned with realism than you may like. Certain 5e tenets were chosen for gameplay reasons at the expense of realism, and the proficiencies mechanics is one of them. Another example is the full healing on a long rest. There is no other way around them than to house rule them if you don't like them. But OTOH with 5e being less crunchy, house ruling that kind of thing can be done without fear of having to rebalance other things. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sell me on 5th…
Top