Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Sell me on the Pendragon Grand Campaign
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cerebral Paladin" data-source="post: 4158824" data-attributes="member: 3448"><p>I have a copy of it-- I haven't run it, but I've read about the first three-quarters.</p><p></p><p>It's a very odd product, associated with the general weirdness of Pendragon. In particular, it offers tremendous year-by-year detail on the progression of the Arthurian era. That's in some ways very cool, although some GMs and players will find it limiting. It does nothing to solve the essential question of "how do you make the PCs the center of the game, when the most important stuff is designed to be done by NPCs?" So you run into several situations which amount to "roll a sequence of criticals or you fail, because hey, you're not Galahad/Lancelot/whomever." There are also some bizarre "oh, you reached this point through perfectly normal gameplay? Roll a critical or die" moments. On the other hand, it provides a huge amount of background and a fairly substantial amount of canned adventures for Pendragon. If the idea of "if it's 512 then there's that battle going on over there, this side will win no matter what, but the PCs can participate and win glory" appeals, then it may work well for you. (I should be clear that there are plenty of side-quest sorts of things that the PCs can totally determine the outcomes of-- there's plenty of scenarios allowing the PCs to defeat an evil baron and take his lands or whathaveyou.)</p><p></p><p>So, if you are a big Pendragon fan and buy into the standard structure of the game (i.e. the PCs are minor to semi-important knights in Arthur's Britain, but they're not the Lancelots of the world and to a significant degree the macro structure of the history of the timeline is set, just not the details involving the PCs), it's very good. But for many people, it's terrible. You need to want what it offers, not something else.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I can't imagine running it as-is, but I might use it as a tool in running a rather different Arthurian game. Others may find that it's perfect for their needs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cerebral Paladin, post: 4158824, member: 3448"] I have a copy of it-- I haven't run it, but I've read about the first three-quarters. It's a very odd product, associated with the general weirdness of Pendragon. In particular, it offers tremendous year-by-year detail on the progression of the Arthurian era. That's in some ways very cool, although some GMs and players will find it limiting. It does nothing to solve the essential question of "how do you make the PCs the center of the game, when the most important stuff is designed to be done by NPCs?" So you run into several situations which amount to "roll a sequence of criticals or you fail, because hey, you're not Galahad/Lancelot/whomever." There are also some bizarre "oh, you reached this point through perfectly normal gameplay? Roll a critical or die" moments. On the other hand, it provides a huge amount of background and a fairly substantial amount of canned adventures for Pendragon. If the idea of "if it's 512 then there's that battle going on over there, this side will win no matter what, but the PCs can participate and win glory" appeals, then it may work well for you. (I should be clear that there are plenty of side-quest sorts of things that the PCs can totally determine the outcomes of-- there's plenty of scenarios allowing the PCs to defeat an evil baron and take his lands or whathaveyou.) So, if you are a big Pendragon fan and buy into the standard structure of the game (i.e. the PCs are minor to semi-important knights in Arthur's Britain, but they're not the Lancelots of the world and to a significant degree the macro structure of the history of the timeline is set, just not the details involving the PCs), it's very good. But for many people, it's terrible. You need to want what it offers, not something else. Personally, I can't imagine running it as-is, but I might use it as a tool in running a rather different Arthurian game. Others may find that it's perfect for their needs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Sell me on the Pendragon Grand Campaign
Top