Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Sell me on Traveller
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="aramis erak" data-source="post: 9090266" data-attributes="member: 6779310"><p>Agreed... but it is really grounded in Frank's <u><em>En Garde!</em></u> rules for character creation and advancement, which was 2 years earlier... which is even more amazing, considering it's still in print, and has been continuously since '75. Currently, Margam-Evans.</p><p></p><p>Disagree. Strongly. </p><p>It's not horrible, but MGT1e retained a number of clunky bits from CT-77 which had been made much smother in CT-81, because the primary author hadn't been given access to CT-81.¹ CT 81 made certain all damages were in whole dice, because that makes the allocation to attributes easier, and makes characters a hair less crunchy. The inclusion of up-or-out by the linking of promotion and retention to one die roll is novel within the Traveller lines. It's also explicitly wrong for the OTU, where many an old NPC is of relatively low rank. (Which is the major Britishism in the GDW editions.) Meanwhile, MgT puts in Up-or-out (an Americanism) while making the enlisted ranks more reminiscent of the UK's...</p><p>Note also: Ranks for the OTU are canonical in rules as well as setting, as they're part of the mercenary unit operations system in <em><u>CT Bk 4 Mercenary.</u></em></p><p></p><p>Given the time crunch Gareth was under, and certain issues otherwise present, it's not horrible. But it's not amazing. And don't get me started on Mr. Steele... Or the rest of MGT Mercenary... Jealous of GW much?²</p><p></p><p>¹: Yes, Gareth and I discussed this. While I was providing some help on trade goods. I verified that Marc had sent them a CD-ROM of CT. And that Gareth hadn't gotten access to it at that point.</p><p>²: it's very interesting to note that just prior to GDW/Marc Miller cancelling almost all the 3PP licenses in 1984, Games Workshop was launching Warhammer Fantasy Battles and advertizing their upcoming Traveller minis rules... then, when the license terminated, suddenly, they launched WH 40K... an imperium, space marines in power armor, comm only at the speed of ships... given that GW had held a license to produce local print runs of CT, and to produce their own 3PP supplements for the OTU...and wrote at least one of the official numbered adventures... 40K appears to be their local Traveller universe... with some bits from other 3PPs'... Now, I don't know if they ever printed local UK runs of CT-81... which if they did, would make the basing of MgT off '77 more understandable...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="aramis erak, post: 9090266, member: 6779310"] Agreed... but it is really grounded in Frank's [U][I]En Garde![/I][/U] rules for character creation and advancement, which was 2 years earlier... which is even more amazing, considering it's still in print, and has been continuously since '75. Currently, Margam-Evans. Disagree. Strongly. It's not horrible, but MGT1e retained a number of clunky bits from CT-77 which had been made much smother in CT-81, because the primary author hadn't been given access to CT-81.¹ CT 81 made certain all damages were in whole dice, because that makes the allocation to attributes easier, and makes characters a hair less crunchy. The inclusion of up-or-out by the linking of promotion and retention to one die roll is novel within the Traveller lines. It's also explicitly wrong for the OTU, where many an old NPC is of relatively low rank. (Which is the major Britishism in the GDW editions.) Meanwhile, MgT puts in Up-or-out (an Americanism) while making the enlisted ranks more reminiscent of the UK's... Note also: Ranks for the OTU are canonical in rules as well as setting, as they're part of the mercenary unit operations system in [I][U]CT Bk 4 Mercenary.[/U][/I] Given the time crunch Gareth was under, and certain issues otherwise present, it's not horrible. But it's not amazing. And don't get me started on Mr. Steele... Or the rest of MGT Mercenary... Jealous of GW much?² ¹: Yes, Gareth and I discussed this. While I was providing some help on trade goods. I verified that Marc had sent them a CD-ROM of CT. And that Gareth hadn't gotten access to it at that point. ²: it's very interesting to note that just prior to GDW/Marc Miller cancelling almost all the 3PP licenses in 1984, Games Workshop was launching Warhammer Fantasy Battles and advertizing their upcoming Traveller minis rules... then, when the license terminated, suddenly, they launched WH 40K... an imperium, space marines in power armor, comm only at the speed of ships... given that GW had held a license to produce local print runs of CT, and to produce their own 3PP supplements for the OTU...and wrote at least one of the official numbered adventures... 40K appears to be their local Traveller universe... with some bits from other 3PPs'... Now, I don't know if they ever printed local UK runs of CT-81... which if they did, would make the basing of MgT off '77 more understandable... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Sell me on Traveller
Top