Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sell the fluff, pimp the crunch
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mirtek" data-source="post: 5673658" data-attributes="member: 40810"><p>It's not the customers responsibility to make sure that WotC's model is sustainable. If they are legally buying by the terms set by WotC, then it's WotC's fault for offering to sell at those terms.</p><p> I don't think we'll ever again see a print dungeon magazine.</p><p> Well, during the last months they seem to try to beat each other at a "how few crunch can we offer this month in Dragon" game</p><p> And all these people would then not only give their free time for free to "work" for WotC but actually pay WotC to be allowed to spend their free time to work for them instead of just thinking "**** this, I am back to runing a home game" because of?</p><p> Because it's much more interesting to not only beg people to DM for them for free, but to beg people to pay them to be allowed to DM for them for free?</p><p></p><p>Since the days of LG I have never seen a Con/Store/other game day location that had too many DMs. I have seen a whole lot of players having been send away because there were too few DMs to have enough seats for all interested players, never seen the opposite. I don't know how it's at the really huge Cons, but all Cons I ever visited had free entry for all days if you just volunteered to DM a single game at a single day.</p><p></p><p>Trying to get the DMs to pay to be allowed to DM? Seriously?</p><p></p><p> The sad thing is that also many long-time DDI subscribers prefer the CBloaded offline builder over the silverlight builder because it offers a much better service.</p><p></p><p>Not because of price, these people are paying their DDI fees, but because it supports more game rules than the official siverlight builder, has fewer bugs, the bugs that appear are fixed more quickly and new material is added faster than into the official silverlight CB. </p><p></p><p>It's also much more user friendly once you have build your character and want to get a character sheet. The official silverlight builder doesn't even let you chose a custom protrait for your sheet, while the offline builder already allowed you to move every information to wherever you want it to be. Want your basic attack in the middle of page 2 instead of the bottom right of page 1? Sure, here you go. The only thing the silverlight builder has going over the offline builder is the ritual book. That was a great addition but is sadly the only point where the silverlight builder is not inferior to the offline builder.</p><p></p><p>Sure improving the service level of the silverlight builder won't ever persuade the people who just want to pirate to get everything for free, however it's sad when pirates enjoy a better service and product than the actual customers</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mirtek, post: 5673658, member: 40810"] It's not the customers responsibility to make sure that WotC's model is sustainable. If they are legally buying by the terms set by WotC, then it's WotC's fault for offering to sell at those terms. I don't think we'll ever again see a print dungeon magazine. Well, during the last months they seem to try to beat each other at a "how few crunch can we offer this month in Dragon" game And all these people would then not only give their free time for free to "work" for WotC but actually pay WotC to be allowed to spend their free time to work for them instead of just thinking "**** this, I am back to runing a home game" because of? Because it's much more interesting to not only beg people to DM for them for free, but to beg people to pay them to be allowed to DM for them for free? Since the days of LG I have never seen a Con/Store/other game day location that had too many DMs. I have seen a whole lot of players having been send away because there were too few DMs to have enough seats for all interested players, never seen the opposite. I don't know how it's at the really huge Cons, but all Cons I ever visited had free entry for all days if you just volunteered to DM a single game at a single day. Trying to get the DMs to pay to be allowed to DM? Seriously? The sad thing is that also many long-time DDI subscribers prefer the CBloaded offline builder over the silverlight builder because it offers a much better service. Not because of price, these people are paying their DDI fees, but because it supports more game rules than the official siverlight builder, has fewer bugs, the bugs that appear are fixed more quickly and new material is added faster than into the official silverlight CB. It's also much more user friendly once you have build your character and want to get a character sheet. The official silverlight builder doesn't even let you chose a custom protrait for your sheet, while the offline builder already allowed you to move every information to wherever you want it to be. Want your basic attack in the middle of page 2 instead of the bottom right of page 1? Sure, here you go. The only thing the silverlight builder has going over the offline builder is the ritual book. That was a great addition but is sadly the only point where the silverlight builder is not inferior to the offline builder. Sure improving the service level of the silverlight builder won't ever persuade the people who just want to pirate to get everything for free, however it's sad when pirates enjoy a better service and product than the actual customers [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sell the fluff, pimp the crunch
Top