Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sell/unsell me on Magic Resistance and Legendary Resistance
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 6861657" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>Honestly, most options are basically "the monster gets to make a roll, instead of just auto-succeeding".</p><p></p><p>But one thing about the original rule that I think must be kept is how a MM monster can use up all its three autosaves in the same round. Even before it has acted. Before it even knows it's under attack!</p><p></p><p>The thing I'm most interested in seeing mechanical discussion on, however, is forms of legendary magic resistance that allows the player the satisfaction of getting "in" his spell; that doesn't simply deny the player some effect. </p><p></p><p>So far the discussion has mostly revolved around different ways to basically give the monster more saves, or even have it automatically make its saves.</p><p></p><p>But what about failing saves and getting affected by the spell's effect - but not in such a way as to be completely out of the fight?</p><p></p><p>I'm thinking that if we could define what it means to be "two-thirds in the fight" and "one-third in the fight" we could simply have legendary monsters have "legendary resilience" and not have to mess with the saves at all. Let the player's spell hit the BBEG as usual and let the player get the satisfaction of a spell well used. Only the BBEG is too legendary to stay down...</p><p></p><p>Then we'd simply track each way you could be "down" (as in petrified, paralyzed, banished or dead) and count "three strikes and you're out".</p><p></p><p><strong>One strike:</strong> you're mostly cosmetically affected. The DM is free to avoid splashy huge effects; like showy lair actions, actions that recharge (dragon breath). If the condition is "immobile" you only move as little as possible to not whiff your action. Use alternative modes of transport if possible. But you're basically free to do anything you need to do to still be effective. Ignore any effect. Break any rule. You're <em>legendary</em>. </p><p></p><p><strong>Two strikes:</strong> you either have disadvantage at everything you do (active abilities) but not defenses. Or the DM only uses your main attack and gives everything else a rest. You're mainly defeated, only the heroes can't just ignore you. If they do, you'll come back (even if only to escape to fight another day).</p><p></p><p><strong>Three strikes:</strong> the heroes actually did it - you are truly defeated (killed/banished/mazed whatevs). The heroes can now mop up any allies and kill your ass when the paralyze/petrification/sleep wears off. Basically, it's over.</p><p></p><p>With this system, all that's left to hash out is to define how often the monster gets shots at comebacks. The easiest suggestion that parallells the rule as written is: </p><p></p><p><strong>At the start of each of your turns: erase one strike from each condition "track" automatically.</strong> </p><p></p><p>A Dragon that's been hit with two Hold Monster and one Maze starts its turn as if it's hit by one Hold Monster (strike one) and no Maze.</p><p></p><p>That's simple, but also fairly crude. There'd be no point in casting different <em>kinds </em>of spells. Let's see if we can't come up with something more satisfying <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 6861657, member: 12731"] Honestly, most options are basically "the monster gets to make a roll, instead of just auto-succeeding". But one thing about the original rule that I think must be kept is how a MM monster can use up all its three autosaves in the same round. Even before it has acted. Before it even knows it's under attack! The thing I'm most interested in seeing mechanical discussion on, however, is forms of legendary magic resistance that allows the player the satisfaction of getting "in" his spell; that doesn't simply deny the player some effect. So far the discussion has mostly revolved around different ways to basically give the monster more saves, or even have it automatically make its saves. But what about failing saves and getting affected by the spell's effect - but not in such a way as to be completely out of the fight? I'm thinking that if we could define what it means to be "two-thirds in the fight" and "one-third in the fight" we could simply have legendary monsters have "legendary resilience" and not have to mess with the saves at all. Let the player's spell hit the BBEG as usual and let the player get the satisfaction of a spell well used. Only the BBEG is too legendary to stay down... Then we'd simply track each way you could be "down" (as in petrified, paralyzed, banished or dead) and count "three strikes and you're out". [B]One strike:[/B] you're mostly cosmetically affected. The DM is free to avoid splashy huge effects; like showy lair actions, actions that recharge (dragon breath). If the condition is "immobile" you only move as little as possible to not whiff your action. Use alternative modes of transport if possible. But you're basically free to do anything you need to do to still be effective. Ignore any effect. Break any rule. You're [I]legendary[/I]. [B]Two strikes:[/B] you either have disadvantage at everything you do (active abilities) but not defenses. Or the DM only uses your main attack and gives everything else a rest. You're mainly defeated, only the heroes can't just ignore you. If they do, you'll come back (even if only to escape to fight another day). [B]Three strikes:[/B] the heroes actually did it - you are truly defeated (killed/banished/mazed whatevs). The heroes can now mop up any allies and kill your ass when the paralyze/petrification/sleep wears off. Basically, it's over. With this system, all that's left to hash out is to define how often the monster gets shots at comebacks. The easiest suggestion that parallells the rule as written is: [B]At the start of each of your turns: erase one strike from each condition "track" automatically.[/B] A Dragon that's been hit with two Hold Monster and one Maze starts its turn as if it's hit by one Hold Monster (strike one) and no Maze. That's simple, but also fairly crude. There'd be no point in casting different [I]kinds [/I]of spells. Let's see if we can't come up with something more satisfying :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Sell/unsell me on Magic Resistance and Legendary Resistance
Top