Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Selling items : illogical rule ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Grabuto138" data-source="post: 4333626" data-attributes="member: 61053"><p>I am sorry but I do not buy this premise. I'd think that adventurers and soldiers who lived long enough to be able to afford magic would be a fraction of an already small market. Most buyers would be collectors or wealthy people making vanity purchases.</p><p></p><p>Also, to reference your much earlier post, I do not think that people who view magic items as tools would be inclined to purchase them used from shifty, homeless, adventurer types. Since their lives depend on these items they would be more likely to buy them from a reputable merchant who has a reputation at stake. They would buy them at 100% from the person who bought it from your character at 20%.</p><p></p><p>Were high-end soldiering my trade I would not buy used body armor. And I wouldn’t buy my H&K MP5 from a wandering South African mercenary. I would happily pay full retail since it is so important. </p><p></p><p>For adventures who consider magic items tools it is unlikely that the specific tool they need to accommodate their specific skills and tactics are available on the secondary market. They would likely have them made by a trusted associate or mage for hire. Even if the item was available, they would probably not trust their lives and a ton of money on the honesty of a bunch of adventurers, who even if well-intentioned may not fully know or understand they item they are selling. They would go to a merchant they trust. </p><p></p><p>Finally, the value of the item is not interchangeable since the market is so small. The price of the Wand +3 may be astronomical since there are currently two powerful Warlocks looking for a wand. Once these guys get their wands the price would drop dramatically. To reference your earlier machine tool example, a propriety set of machine tools would be worth a fortune if one of a few potential purchasers were looking to buy one. They would be worthless otherwise. </p><p></p><p>Much of this is moot, however, in the context of the Skill Challenge. You can find the Warlock who wants the wand, or the company looking for the machine tools. You just have to role play it out. Otherwise you dump it for 20%</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Grabuto138, post: 4333626, member: 61053"] I am sorry but I do not buy this premise. I'd think that adventurers and soldiers who lived long enough to be able to afford magic would be a fraction of an already small market. Most buyers would be collectors or wealthy people making vanity purchases. Also, to reference your much earlier post, I do not think that people who view magic items as tools would be inclined to purchase them used from shifty, homeless, adventurer types. Since their lives depend on these items they would be more likely to buy them from a reputable merchant who has a reputation at stake. They would buy them at 100% from the person who bought it from your character at 20%. Were high-end soldiering my trade I would not buy used body armor. And I wouldn’t buy my H&K MP5 from a wandering South African mercenary. I would happily pay full retail since it is so important. For adventures who consider magic items tools it is unlikely that the specific tool they need to accommodate their specific skills and tactics are available on the secondary market. They would likely have them made by a trusted associate or mage for hire. Even if the item was available, they would probably not trust their lives and a ton of money on the honesty of a bunch of adventurers, who even if well-intentioned may not fully know or understand they item they are selling. They would go to a merchant they trust. Finally, the value of the item is not interchangeable since the market is so small. The price of the Wand +3 may be astronomical since there are currently two powerful Warlocks looking for a wand. Once these guys get their wands the price would drop dramatically. To reference your earlier machine tool example, a propriety set of machine tools would be worth a fortune if one of a few potential purchasers were looking to buy one. They would be worthless otherwise. Much of this is moot, however, in the context of the Skill Challenge. You can find the Warlock who wants the wand, or the company looking for the machine tools. You just have to role play it out. Otherwise you dump it for 20% [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Selling items : illogical rule ?
Top