Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Seminar Transcript - Class Design: From Assassins to Wizards
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 5796070" data-attributes="member: 957"><p>First. I've never played that you forget unused spells unless you choose to free up the slot. But I'm also fine with Vancian, fine without Vancian and can easily see why someone else might reasonably dislike it...</p><p></p><p>But on encounter based powers, it is an arbitrary and internally inconsistent frequency. Something may work once a day because that is they way the story of the power works. And once every 15 minutes could be justified in certain cases. </p><p></p><p>It doesn't make sense for a great power to offer a warlock a power usable "once per encounter".</p><p></p><p>"I, the Great Lord GeGe, as a reward for this pact you have entered bestow upon you the power of Really Cool Winking. You may use this power once per encounter."</p><p>"Um, ok, thanks. How do I know if an encounter is over and I can use it again? What if I Really Cool Wink Sarah and while I'm still talking to Sarah, Karen shows up? Is she a new encounter with Sarah still here, cuz I like REALLY want to Really Cool Wink at her. Did I waste it? If I can get Sarah to leave is it NOW a new encounter?"</p><p>"Do not anger the Great Lord GeGe with your narrative demands, just make something up to explain it each time!!!"</p><p></p><p>Vancian is ABSOLUTELY arbitrary. No argument there. But it has two things going for it over "encounter". The first is that the idea is based fully on a story idea and once that narrative description is embraced, it is no longer arbitrary. So the arbitrary choice is driven by story preference not mechanical expectations. Second, once it is accepted, it is internally consistent. </p><p></p><p>And, I don't think we should go any further on this in this thread.....</p><p></p><p>I'd be happy to continue in a new thread if you would to discuss further. Or not. Your call.</p><p></p><p>To be clear, this is the first red flag I've seen. We are a long way from deal breaker. We are also a long way from "this is an improvement over what I have now, therefore I am switching". But we are still VERY much in play and keeping my interest. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 5796070, member: 957"] First. I've never played that you forget unused spells unless you choose to free up the slot. But I'm also fine with Vancian, fine without Vancian and can easily see why someone else might reasonably dislike it... But on encounter based powers, it is an arbitrary and internally inconsistent frequency. Something may work once a day because that is they way the story of the power works. And once every 15 minutes could be justified in certain cases. It doesn't make sense for a great power to offer a warlock a power usable "once per encounter". "I, the Great Lord GeGe, as a reward for this pact you have entered bestow upon you the power of Really Cool Winking. You may use this power once per encounter." "Um, ok, thanks. How do I know if an encounter is over and I can use it again? What if I Really Cool Wink Sarah and while I'm still talking to Sarah, Karen shows up? Is she a new encounter with Sarah still here, cuz I like REALLY want to Really Cool Wink at her. Did I waste it? If I can get Sarah to leave is it NOW a new encounter?" "Do not anger the Great Lord GeGe with your narrative demands, just make something up to explain it each time!!!" Vancian is ABSOLUTELY arbitrary. No argument there. But it has two things going for it over "encounter". The first is that the idea is based fully on a story idea and once that narrative description is embraced, it is no longer arbitrary. So the arbitrary choice is driven by story preference not mechanical expectations. Second, once it is accepted, it is internally consistent. And, I don't think we should go any further on this in this thread..... I'd be happy to continue in a new thread if you would to discuss further. Or not. Your call. To be clear, this is the first red flag I've seen. We are a long way from deal breaker. We are also a long way from "this is an improvement over what I have now, therefore I am switching". But we are still VERY much in play and keeping my interest. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Seminar Transcript - Class Design: From Assassins to Wizards
Top