Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Seminar Transcript - Reimagining Skills and Ability Scores
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 5803424" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>Yeah, the problem is if a LOT of things are just foisted off into theme then they are all mutually exclusive. Each and every thing that is exclusive with other races should be a RACE, not a theme. </p><p></p><p>Not only that but the whole 4e deva is nothing like a theme. Devas don't have any overlap with other races. They are a 'race' of beings (admittedly not a culture and not a biological race exactly) that stands alone. It would make ZERO sense to talk about a 'human deva' or an 'elf deva'. What if I wanted to be a deva pirate or a deva knight too? It simply doesn't make sense except as a race.</p><p></p><p>I could see Revenant as something besides a race, some sort of 'template' or something, but it actually made sense mechanically in 4e as a race that was an overlay on another race. You could be a human revenant, but you weren't exactly a human, yet you still had all the other customization choices that any character has (again, as a theme revenant makes less sense, why can't I be a revenant pirate). Honestly I wouldn't expect anything as fringe as a revenant to be in the core books (it is not in any 4e book until HoS, before that it was a DDI race for a long time).</p><p></p><p>Of course maybe what this begs us to ask is if there's a more sophisticated possibility than just "you have a theme" because there are certainly a lot of times when it feels like there are 'overlays' that I'd like to have on my character that aren't mutually exclusive.</p><p></p><p>I almost feel like a better design for ALL this kind of stuff, PPs etc included would be something like the player and the DM agree on when it is thematic for a PC to have a specific 'overlay'. Maybe it can list some conditions that the PC should meet thematically (IE Pirate: you are a member of a crew of freebooters and have some familiarity with shipboard life and crewing a vessel). Once the player and DM agree, then the PC 'evinces' that overlay (IE they get access to the things that overlay can provide). There are no limits on the number and types of overlays a PC can evince (some might be mutually exclusive of course). </p><p></p><p>This way you could be a Vampire and a druid and an elf at the same time. Vampire is an overlay. Culture can be one too, as is background, etc. Each of these things can contribute any number of swaps the character can use. Some might also grant something outright, but that would probably be pretty rare since there would be no limits to how many overlays you could have in theory. Of course the DM could take them away too, and some overlays might even be bad. Curses could be overlays, etc. Anything that can be systematically character defining.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 5803424, member: 82106"] Yeah, the problem is if a LOT of things are just foisted off into theme then they are all mutually exclusive. Each and every thing that is exclusive with other races should be a RACE, not a theme. Not only that but the whole 4e deva is nothing like a theme. Devas don't have any overlap with other races. They are a 'race' of beings (admittedly not a culture and not a biological race exactly) that stands alone. It would make ZERO sense to talk about a 'human deva' or an 'elf deva'. What if I wanted to be a deva pirate or a deva knight too? It simply doesn't make sense except as a race. I could see Revenant as something besides a race, some sort of 'template' or something, but it actually made sense mechanically in 4e as a race that was an overlay on another race. You could be a human revenant, but you weren't exactly a human, yet you still had all the other customization choices that any character has (again, as a theme revenant makes less sense, why can't I be a revenant pirate). Honestly I wouldn't expect anything as fringe as a revenant to be in the core books (it is not in any 4e book until HoS, before that it was a DDI race for a long time). Of course maybe what this begs us to ask is if there's a more sophisticated possibility than just "you have a theme" because there are certainly a lot of times when it feels like there are 'overlays' that I'd like to have on my character that aren't mutually exclusive. I almost feel like a better design for ALL this kind of stuff, PPs etc included would be something like the player and the DM agree on when it is thematic for a PC to have a specific 'overlay'. Maybe it can list some conditions that the PC should meet thematically (IE Pirate: you are a member of a crew of freebooters and have some familiarity with shipboard life and crewing a vessel). Once the player and DM agree, then the PC 'evinces' that overlay (IE they get access to the things that overlay can provide). There are no limits on the number and types of overlays a PC can evince (some might be mutually exclusive of course). This way you could be a Vampire and a druid and an elf at the same time. Vampire is an overlay. Culture can be one too, as is background, etc. Each of these things can contribute any number of swaps the character can use. Some might also grant something outright, but that would probably be pretty rare since there would be no limits to how many overlays you could have in theory. Of course the DM could take them away too, and some overlays might even be bad. Curses could be overlays, etc. Anything that can be systematically character defining. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Seminar Transcript - Reimagining Skills and Ability Scores
Top