Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Seminar Transcript - Reimagining Skills and Ability Scores
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zustiur" data-source="post: 5803718" data-attributes="member: 1544"><p>I agree with you, but I still don't want them in the first players handbook.</p><p>I think that's what people are forgetting here. You can't fit everything in the first book. Unless you make it like say, The Encyclopaedia Britannica 'book'.</p><p>I love devas and dragonborn, even if they did take a while to grow on me. But I don't want them right at the start. They always felt like really rare races to me. Common races need to be available first. The same applies to tieflings. </p><p>We all have to bear in mind that somethings will not be available at the start - It just can't be done. SOMETHING has to be left out. It is logical therefore to leave out the things which appear in the fewest editions. Devas and Avengers only appeared in 4E, and even there they weren't in the first PH. </p><p></p><p>The community is a bit too focused on the extremities right now. WotC are trying to unite a very large group of disparate people. That's no easy task, especially when 4E put many of those people in a very anti-WotC mindset. We, and they, need to focus on the actual core of the game first. Whether devas or avengers play a big part in your games or not is not a criterion for putting them in the initial release on 5E. If they play a big part in EVERYONE's games, then we need to look at it. </p><p></p><p>2E started with 6 races. 3E started with 7. 4E started with 8. If 5E continues the trend and starts with 9, that's still only a very small portion of the available player races we've seen across all editions. People get too caught up in forming an opinion on an edition before it is 'complete'. The first 3 books simply cannot contain everything. The sooner we accept that the better. There is really no point in judging 5E by the races we see in PH1.</p><p></p><p>Also, please bear in mind that some of the things people are picking up on are just random thoughts thrown out by the developers - they haven't categorically said avengers would be a theme, they just suggested it as an option.</p><p></p><p>To me personally, having a deva soul in a reincarnated body as a theme make perfect sense. That doesn't mean this is the option they will go with though.</p><p>As for Avengers, I always saw them as an alternative to paladins. Turning them into a kit or prestige class or some other variant form of paladin makes perfect sense to me. If that's called a 'theme' now, then so be it.</p><p></p><p>Every edition of DND takes common English words and twists them a bit. In this instance it looks like theme is going to be one of those words. From what we've heard thus far (which is very little!) 5E theme is very different from 4E theme.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zustiur, post: 5803718, member: 1544"] I agree with you, but I still don't want them in the first players handbook. I think that's what people are forgetting here. You can't fit everything in the first book. Unless you make it like say, The Encyclopaedia Britannica 'book'. I love devas and dragonborn, even if they did take a while to grow on me. But I don't want them right at the start. They always felt like really rare races to me. Common races need to be available first. The same applies to tieflings. We all have to bear in mind that somethings will not be available at the start - It just can't be done. SOMETHING has to be left out. It is logical therefore to leave out the things which appear in the fewest editions. Devas and Avengers only appeared in 4E, and even there they weren't in the first PH. The community is a bit too focused on the extremities right now. WotC are trying to unite a very large group of disparate people. That's no easy task, especially when 4E put many of those people in a very anti-WotC mindset. We, and they, need to focus on the actual core of the game first. Whether devas or avengers play a big part in your games or not is not a criterion for putting them in the initial release on 5E. If they play a big part in EVERYONE's games, then we need to look at it. 2E started with 6 races. 3E started with 7. 4E started with 8. If 5E continues the trend and starts with 9, that's still only a very small portion of the available player races we've seen across all editions. People get too caught up in forming an opinion on an edition before it is 'complete'. The first 3 books simply cannot contain everything. The sooner we accept that the better. There is really no point in judging 5E by the races we see in PH1. Also, please bear in mind that some of the things people are picking up on are just random thoughts thrown out by the developers - they haven't categorically said avengers would be a theme, they just suggested it as an option. To me personally, having a deva soul in a reincarnated body as a theme make perfect sense. That doesn't mean this is the option they will go with though. As for Avengers, I always saw them as an alternative to paladins. Turning them into a kit or prestige class or some other variant form of paladin makes perfect sense to me. If that's called a 'theme' now, then so be it. Every edition of DND takes common English words and twists them a bit. In this instance it looks like theme is going to be one of those words. From what we've heard thus far (which is very little!) 5E theme is very different from 4E theme. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Seminar Transcript - Reimagining Skills and Ability Scores
Top