Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sense Motive - passive or active?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="two" data-source="post: 1532496" data-attributes="member: 9002"><p>I'm not contemptuous of your playing style; I just think it's based on some rather silly assumptions both about Sense Motive, "real life," and linking PC traits with "player traits." Obviously you can and should play however you want; that does not mean I will accept your play assumptions as "valid" or even "reasonable" or even "in the spirit of the rules" (or even, "something fun I would ever want to be associated with"). To repeat: play however you want. Likewise, I will continue to think badly of certain decisions you have made leading to that playing style, and will maintain (as is my right) that I would not have much fun in your game, probably, nor would a lot of other people. Which you probably care as much about as, say, the black ant I killed with my left hand when I was eight. But, luckily, I'm a man, and can take such serious slights. </p><p></p><p>Why I think you reasoning is silly:</p><p></p><p>You bring "real life" into the game, making game mechanics fit your view of "real life" (which I think, in addition, is flawed). For example, because you don't "sense lies/etc." in real life without concentrating, PC's don't either. I might claim that you in RL are not very good as these sorts of things; and just because you don't do them automatically, it's wrong to assume everyone can't thus PC's (none of them) can. That's just ridiculously egocentric. It's a big world, a big one, people can do a lot of crazy things -- yes, even some things you are not capable of (take a deep breath). A very empathic, experienced bartender might sense almost all "lies/half-truths" automatically; obviously a horny teenage boy might miss even the most obvious signals of untruth. A professional gambler might notice everything automatically. Who are you to say? And why bring this into a game which has clear fictional precidents who can and often DO "sense motive" in a passive way all the time (and very effectively, often, i.e. "I didn't like the way that waiter handed me my coffee, I will upend my cup -- hey! It's acid!").</p><p></p><p>I also don't like how your style of play cheapens social-interaction skills, or forces a social PC to be incredibly obnoxious ("I sense motive." "I sense motive." "I sense motive." Repeat ad nauseum, ad infinitum). Is this fun for anyone? Why force players to bring up mechanical rolls all the time if you care about roleplaying? Isn't this the last thing you want?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="two, post: 1532496, member: 9002"] I'm not contemptuous of your playing style; I just think it's based on some rather silly assumptions both about Sense Motive, "real life," and linking PC traits with "player traits." Obviously you can and should play however you want; that does not mean I will accept your play assumptions as "valid" or even "reasonable" or even "in the spirit of the rules" (or even, "something fun I would ever want to be associated with"). To repeat: play however you want. Likewise, I will continue to think badly of certain decisions you have made leading to that playing style, and will maintain (as is my right) that I would not have much fun in your game, probably, nor would a lot of other people. Which you probably care as much about as, say, the black ant I killed with my left hand when I was eight. But, luckily, I'm a man, and can take such serious slights. Why I think you reasoning is silly: You bring "real life" into the game, making game mechanics fit your view of "real life" (which I think, in addition, is flawed). For example, because you don't "sense lies/etc." in real life without concentrating, PC's don't either. I might claim that you in RL are not very good as these sorts of things; and just because you don't do them automatically, it's wrong to assume everyone can't thus PC's (none of them) can. That's just ridiculously egocentric. It's a big world, a big one, people can do a lot of crazy things -- yes, even some things you are not capable of (take a deep breath). A very empathic, experienced bartender might sense almost all "lies/half-truths" automatically; obviously a horny teenage boy might miss even the most obvious signals of untruth. A professional gambler might notice everything automatically. Who are you to say? And why bring this into a game which has clear fictional precidents who can and often DO "sense motive" in a passive way all the time (and very effectively, often, i.e. "I didn't like the way that waiter handed me my coffee, I will upend my cup -- hey! It's acid!"). I also don't like how your style of play cheapens social-interaction skills, or forces a social PC to be incredibly obnoxious ("I sense motive." "I sense motive." "I sense motive." Repeat ad nauseum, ad infinitum). Is this fun for anyone? Why force players to bring up mechanical rolls all the time if you care about roleplaying? Isn't this the last thing you want? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Sense Motive - passive or active?
Top