Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Separating challenge and complexity in monster design
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ProgBard" data-source="post: 7016085" data-attributes="member: 6803722"><p>Answers, plus some assorted thoughts:</p><p></p><p>1. I run for a big table - seven, sometimes eight players: valor bard, paladin, battle master, arcane trickster, bear totem barbarian, moon druid, war cleric, and sometimes dragon sorcerer. No one will be shocked by now to learn that 5e's challenge math wanders well off the map with big parties.</p><p>2. Most are first-time players, but one is by admission a recovering powergamer. They were 8th level in their last big boss-fight; they're 9th level now, and gearing up for their next one.</p><p>3. I don't really adjust AC/HP, though I will use higher-CR statblocks for at least some of the minions in a battle. I never use solo monsters - always boss + minions, or several different types of creatures working together. The last fight where they really started to get worried about burning resources was a few levels back (5? 6? Now I don't recall), and it involved an 18-level warlock, a flesh golem, a mi-go, and two vampire spawn. It worked in part because they had to divide resources to pursue several goals: while the warlock and her minions were trying to kill the party, the mi-go was trying to fly off with a powerful Maguffin that they needed to prevent getting into the hands of the <em>other </em>bad guys, and the fight was going on in two levels of a tower, making it difficult to coordinate efforts.</p><p>4. The last big fight was against a <em>ridiculous </em>number of opponents, but lots of those were mooks (1 HD cultists) - they like the feeling of mowing down lots of foes, and I'm inclined to accomodate (especially since even a mook can get in a hit once in a while). There was also another high-level warlock, a necromancer, an ogre, a Far Realm horror (basically a giant octopus with a black dragon wyrmling's breath weapon), and assorted cult fanatics, kuo-toa, thugs, and pactsworn champions (veterans with a couple of warlock spells). I threw in some of those (and increased the numbers) when the party decided they were going to use the silver <em>horn of Valhalla</em> they'd just found and summoned almost the maximum number of berserkers. Having that support made a <em>huge </em>difference, obviously, but the players also made good strategic choices, like sending in the barbarian to take out the necromancer quick, who got cornered and taken down before she could start raising some of the fallen cultists as zombies.</p><p>5. (The good news - for a diabolical DM's version of <em>good</em>, anyway - is that the next fight's going to be tougher, and the <em>horn of Valhalla</em> won't have had enough time to reset. I had assumed they were going to save it for this fight, but they didn't, so that's not a resource that's available to them now. It will be interesting to see how much they wish they'd kept it in reserve when this plays out.)</p><p>6. It may be relevant to know that I don't try and design <em>every </em>fight as a drain on the PCs' resources - some are there because it's fun to have a battle as part of the evening's play. I still rely on pretty tough monsters for those, sometimes with minions as well. Three or four CR 5-6 creatures are a good choice for this kind of thing; I think if I wanted to make the fight more challenging, I'd increase the number of foes, not hit dice or AC.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ProgBard, post: 7016085, member: 6803722"] Answers, plus some assorted thoughts: 1. I run for a big table - seven, sometimes eight players: valor bard, paladin, battle master, arcane trickster, bear totem barbarian, moon druid, war cleric, and sometimes dragon sorcerer. No one will be shocked by now to learn that 5e's challenge math wanders well off the map with big parties. 2. Most are first-time players, but one is by admission a recovering powergamer. They were 8th level in their last big boss-fight; they're 9th level now, and gearing up for their next one. 3. I don't really adjust AC/HP, though I will use higher-CR statblocks for at least some of the minions in a battle. I never use solo monsters - always boss + minions, or several different types of creatures working together. The last fight where they really started to get worried about burning resources was a few levels back (5? 6? Now I don't recall), and it involved an 18-level warlock, a flesh golem, a mi-go, and two vampire spawn. It worked in part because they had to divide resources to pursue several goals: while the warlock and her minions were trying to kill the party, the mi-go was trying to fly off with a powerful Maguffin that they needed to prevent getting into the hands of the [I]other [/I]bad guys, and the fight was going on in two levels of a tower, making it difficult to coordinate efforts. 4. The last big fight was against a [I]ridiculous [/I]number of opponents, but lots of those were mooks (1 HD cultists) - they like the feeling of mowing down lots of foes, and I'm inclined to accomodate (especially since even a mook can get in a hit once in a while). There was also another high-level warlock, a necromancer, an ogre, a Far Realm horror (basically a giant octopus with a black dragon wyrmling's breath weapon), and assorted cult fanatics, kuo-toa, thugs, and pactsworn champions (veterans with a couple of warlock spells). I threw in some of those (and increased the numbers) when the party decided they were going to use the silver [I]horn of Valhalla[/I] they'd just found and summoned almost the maximum number of berserkers. Having that support made a [I]huge [/I]difference, obviously, but the players also made good strategic choices, like sending in the barbarian to take out the necromancer quick, who got cornered and taken down before she could start raising some of the fallen cultists as zombies. 5. (The good news - for a diabolical DM's version of [I]good[/I], anyway - is that the next fight's going to be tougher, and the [I]horn of Valhalla[/I] won't have had enough time to reset. I had assumed they were going to save it for this fight, but they didn't, so that's not a resource that's available to them now. It will be interesting to see how much they wish they'd kept it in reserve when this plays out.) 6. It may be relevant to know that I don't try and design [I]every [/I]fight as a drain on the PCs' resources - some are there because it's fun to have a battle as part of the evening's play. I still rely on pretty tough monsters for those, sometimes with minions as well. Three or four CR 5-6 creatures are a good choice for this kind of thing; I think if I wanted to make the fight more challenging, I'd increase the number of foes, not hit dice or AC. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Separating challenge and complexity in monster design
Top