Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DEP" data-source="post: 4452076" data-attributes="member: 70847">I must agre 110% with Merric on this one. WotC has very poor decision making skills. I have been vocal with how upset I am on the Paizo boards, I believe I was the first to post this there, and I left a rather bitter comment on the WotC boards. I have a 4e campaign up and going right now. It is a converted STAP. It had too many players for everyone's liking, which would be 10. I personally didn't mind that much. It is now down to 7. I was considering the SoWAP for a second campaign, but after this, they have lost myself and my 9 other players who looked forward to the DDI, although I lost hope a long time ago, this AP was what would make or break it for me. I hyped up a new AP and my players were happy as they all love the RHoD. After this news, their responses were pretty much this: You mean to tell me the people who made this game won't give us an outline to help our ingame playing and our enjoyment. Nuts to this.  So we are going to 3.5 or Pathfinder.  Well done WotC, losing 10 people and their families. Too bad it wasn't a shock. As for the previews, the Shackled City did not have one, AoW did in Erik Mona's editorials he talked alot about the rough outline and such. I think Paizo put one up online also. The STAP had a full outline that was 5 pages in an issue after the AoW ended.</blockquote>