Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Infiniti2000" data-source="post: 2752456" data-attributes="member: 31734">Actually, I meant intractable, but I guess the synonym to &quot;infeasible&quot; or &quot;impracticable&quot; is archaic.&nbsp; Oh well.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />&nbsp; It's impractical not just because of all the weapon choices, but all of the feats, ability score choices, character classes, etc.&nbsp; Someone might have spear because of weapon choices, or deity-granted bonuses, etc.&nbsp; Anyway, I certainly don't expect to have any prove my statement wrong or for me to justify it.&nbsp; It's merely an opinion, nothing more.&nbsp;I see what you're saying.&nbsp; I specifically pointed out earlier that I don't feel it's unbalanced that way, so I didn't mean &quot;no downside&quot; as saying it's too good or anything.&nbsp; My point was merely that it was odd.&nbsp; In other words, if you have a spear and plan to ready an action to attack, you will always ready to set against a charge.&nbsp; Why?&nbsp; Because there's no downside to it at all if when readying against a charge you are also considered readied against a non-charge.&nbsp; Don't you find that odd?&nbsp;We are definitely not.&nbsp; Your two points for a downside are comparing readying with not readying.&nbsp; That's not what I'm talking about at all, and totally off-topic from the OP.&nbsp; If it helps bring this non-debate to and end, you and I seem to agree 100%, except that you don't seem to agree that we are not talking about the same topic.&nbsp; <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing&nbsp; &nbsp; :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /> &nbsp;Well, there you go.&nbsp; That's exactly it.&nbsp; I agree it's not really an issue because either way is not really unbalanced, but that's the question raised by the OP.&nbsp; Are we good to go, then? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Infiniti2000, post: 2752456, member: 31734"] Actually, I meant intractable, but I guess the synonym to "infeasible" or "impracticable" is archaic. Oh well. :) It's impractical not just because of all the weapon choices, but all of the feats, ability score choices, character classes, etc. Someone might have spear because of weapon choices, or deity-granted bonuses, etc. Anyway, I certainly don't expect to have any prove my statement wrong or for me to justify it. It's merely an opinion, nothing more. I see what you're saying. I specifically pointed out earlier that I don't feel it's unbalanced that way, so I didn't mean "no downside" as saying it's too good or anything. My point was merely that it was odd. In other words, if you have a spear and plan to ready an action to attack, you will always ready to set against a charge. Why? Because there's no downside to it at all if when readying against a charge you are also considered readied against a non-charge. Don't you find that odd? We are definitely not. Your two points for a downside are comparing readying with not readying. That's not what I'm talking about at all, and totally off-topic from the OP. If it helps bring this non-debate to and end, you and I seem to agree 100%, except that you don't seem to agree that we are not talking about the same topic. :lol: Well, there you go. That's exactly it. I agree it's not really an issue because either way is not really unbalanced, but that's the question raised by the OP. Are we good to go, then? ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification