Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Setting Sun: Fluff vs. Crunch?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="StreamOfTheSky" data-source="post: 4470106" data-attributes="member: 35909"><p>I noticed something I hadn't given much thought to as I ran an adventure last night, but is really bothering me now.</p><p></p><p>One of the players is a Half-Giant (and thus has powerful build) that uses a Whip-dagger and specializes in Setting Sun throws. Obviously, he generally chooses the "strength option," especially since he left his dexterity at 6. He did VERY well, counter charging, tripping, and throwing successfully almost every attempt. Which is fine, since at AC 13, he's also a giant walking punching bag for damage.</p><p></p><p>My issue was the realization that he was getting far more benefit out of the maneuvers than the discipline's "target" practictioner, a smallish dex-based fighter. I don't mind if the benefits were equal even, but the checks are just plain easier to make for larger, strong users. I checked Mighty Throw, which most of the throw maneuvers reference, just to fully digest the synergy at work. You generally get a static +4 bonus, can choose str or dex, and since it's a trip check, you are implicitly allowed size bonus. Not only is this not true in reverse for a dexterity throw (+4 for each size smaller than medium), I'm starting to think, per RAW, a small swordsage would actually <strong>suffer</strong> a -4 penalty on any throw attempt!</p><p></p><p>Am I alone in finding this mildly revolting and completely contradictory to the flavor text of...just about everything about the discipline? If not, what should be done about it? Add in a "reverse" size bonus for dex-throws? That would just screw over medium sized characters more, though. Remove size bonuses from strength throws (and obviously from dex ones)? I'm not sure. Doesn't make logical sense you're making a trip check but not using size, and it's always difficult to impose a nerf on a character after the game's started. Especially since a) I helped him build this character and b) because of of role-playing, he's chosen to make some sub-par decisions in the build to better fit his vision (like the aforementioned crud AC) and as a result, on the whole, his character isn't overpowered.</p><p></p><p>But still, I'd like to fix how the system works to better fit the flavor text, even if I have to dance around not making it affect his character.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="StreamOfTheSky, post: 4470106, member: 35909"] I noticed something I hadn't given much thought to as I ran an adventure last night, but is really bothering me now. One of the players is a Half-Giant (and thus has powerful build) that uses a Whip-dagger and specializes in Setting Sun throws. Obviously, he generally chooses the "strength option," especially since he left his dexterity at 6. He did VERY well, counter charging, tripping, and throwing successfully almost every attempt. Which is fine, since at AC 13, he's also a giant walking punching bag for damage. My issue was the realization that he was getting far more benefit out of the maneuvers than the discipline's "target" practictioner, a smallish dex-based fighter. I don't mind if the benefits were equal even, but the checks are just plain easier to make for larger, strong users. I checked Mighty Throw, which most of the throw maneuvers reference, just to fully digest the synergy at work. You generally get a static +4 bonus, can choose str or dex, and since it's a trip check, you are implicitly allowed size bonus. Not only is this not true in reverse for a dexterity throw (+4 for each size smaller than medium), I'm starting to think, per RAW, a small swordsage would actually [b]suffer[/b] a -4 penalty on any throw attempt! Am I alone in finding this mildly revolting and completely contradictory to the flavor text of...just about everything about the discipline? If not, what should be done about it? Add in a "reverse" size bonus for dex-throws? That would just screw over medium sized characters more, though. Remove size bonuses from strength throws (and obviously from dex ones)? I'm not sure. Doesn't make logical sense you're making a trip check but not using size, and it's always difficult to impose a nerf on a character after the game's started. Especially since a) I helped him build this character and b) because of of role-playing, he's chosen to make some sub-par decisions in the build to better fit his vision (like the aforementioned crud AC) and as a result, on the whole, his character isn't overpowered. But still, I'd like to fix how the system works to better fit the flavor text, even if I have to dance around not making it affect his character. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Setting Sun: Fluff vs. Crunch?
Top