Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Crothian" data-source="post: 153148" data-attributes="member: 232">Overall not too bad.  None seem openly broken and I really like that you have added notes as to why each feat was designed.  Specific comments to follow:Expert Duelist [General, Fighter]: I'd have the number rounded down just to remain consistant with everything else.  CAn this be combined with Improved Expertise?  Is the expertise bonus still applies to all combatants?Focused Strike [General]: Once a day per BAB might be a little much.  But I do like the idea it's based off of BAB so it'll be effected by multi classing.  I'd increase the Prerequiste just because I suggest it for the one below.Kensei [General]: I'd add a BAB prerequite of about 8 onto this one.  The extra interative attacks are huge.  But it does make sense to build this type of character through feats.  Punishing Strike [General, Fighter]: This I really like.  The ability to take advantage of your opponet when he messes up.  The name fits.  I'd add Combat Reflexes as a prerequite.Spellblade [General]: Again another good one.  I'd up the BAB to 4 that way the character has time to focus his craft.Superior Ambidexterity [General, Fighter]: Another version of this.  Personally, when I made it was called Ambidexterious Strength and I added Str 15+ as a requirement.  It's in Quintissential Fighter as Off-Handed Weapon Expert.  They require one have dex 13+ and bab 4+.Twin Attack [General, Fighter]: This is the only one I'm worried about.  The potential of two attacks as a standard action is very strong.  Since the first has to hit before the second is even rolled helps.  The prerequistes are also nice and high, so I think it does work although strong.</blockquote>

Verification