Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Raith5" data-source="post: 5943735" data-attributes="member: 56051">Agree. I prefer the 4th ed idea of spell level equally character level because it makes more sense to me, but I could certainly live with 9 or 10 levels.For me the way spells are organized is something where they should try something new and move away from the 'legacy' of previous editions. For instance I would like to see the idea of spell lists to stretch the granularity of the spell effectsSo a first level sleep could sleep one target, second level multiple foes could be made drowsy, third level sleep multiple foes or something like this.When I saw the spells in the playtest I thought I recognize this and it certainly D&D but it just looks boring to me. I hope they can push the envelope here and do something more interesting and fresh here.</blockquote>