Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Shin Okada" data-source="post: 6485375" data-attributes="member: 1956">After several days of thinking, I came up with another interpretation of this rule.It says &quot;light&quot;, not &quot;illumination&quot;. And the rule is not using usual rule term regarding illumination (either of 3.0e nor 3.5e). So, in this case, &quot;light&quot; may mean &quot;light source&quot;.I mean, this SP ability (need a standard action) can decrease the effectiveness of light sources within 100-foot radius when used (need a standard action). But after that, anyone can bring in, or make, some new light sources (including spells) and they work as usual until a shade uses another Control Light ability. Also, this ability does not work against natural day light because the Sun is more than 100-foot away from a shade (usually).Basically, this interpretation takes Control Light as a target type ability which targets indefinite number of multiple light sources within 100-foot radius, not an area-effect type which centers on a shade.Do you think this is a reasonable interpretation?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Shin Okada, post: 6485375, member: 1956"] After several days of thinking, I came up with another interpretation of this rule. It says "light", not "illumination". And the rule is not using usual rule term regarding illumination (either of 3.0e nor 3.5e). So, in this case, "light" may mean "light source". I mean, this SP ability (need a standard action) can decrease the effectiveness of light sources within 100-foot radius when used (need a standard action). But after that, anyone can bring in, or make, some new light sources (including spells) and they work as usual until a shade uses another Control Light ability. Also, this ability does not work against natural day light because the Sun is more than 100-foot away from a shade (usually). Basically, this interpretation takes Control Light as a target type ability which targets indefinite number of multiple light sources within 100-foot radius, not an area-effect type which centers on a shade. Do you think this is a reasonable interpretation? [/QUOTE]

Verification