Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Shadorun without the shadowrun rules
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mmu1" data-source="post: 4159006" data-attributes="member: 319"><p>SR4 changed <em>all</em> of the core rules. Sure, some similiarities remained - some of the stats still had the same names, you used point buy to create characters, you still rolled pools of d6s to resolve stuff - but the actual mechanics have very little in common with SR3 anymore. No combat pool, set TNs, a completely different wound system - and that's just the tip of the iceberg. </p><p></p><p>Though for the record, I was actually very excited about SR4, when I first heard about it - I thought that (for example) the matrix rules were too complex (or needed an alternate simplified mechanic) the magic rules too binary (characters either ended up shrugging off spells or being dead meat, depending on how they were designed, and God help you if you didn't get your Willpower to 6), and the rigging rules too clunky and unbalanced, so I loved the idea of a new edition... until it became clear they were throwing all the rules out the window, including the ones I really liked.</p><p></p><p>On top of it all, rather than come up with something new, they settled on a core mechanic that was almost an exact copy of the old WoD rules - except using d6s instead of d10s.</p><p></p><p>The only thing they kept (and actually made worse) was my least favorite aspect of the old system - the need to roll stupidly large (even bigger in SR4 than in SR3) amounts of d6s. At least in SR3, there was some point to it, because of the way variable TNs and success tresholds worked (even if it wasn't the most elegant system in the world), but in SR4, it's just a useless hold-over. The system could have been replaced by M&M style tresholds and opposed rolls, but they decided to stick with it to hide the fact there was nothing left of the old game anymore. </p><p>Hell, when they first did PR for it, they had so few things they could list in the FAQ under "What stayed the same?", they actully put down "you still roll tons of d6s" as one of the handful of answers. (most of the others had to do with the fluff, and not the crunch, too)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mmu1, post: 4159006, member: 319"] SR4 changed [i]all[/i] of the core rules. Sure, some similiarities remained - some of the stats still had the same names, you used point buy to create characters, you still rolled pools of d6s to resolve stuff - but the actual mechanics have very little in common with SR3 anymore. No combat pool, set TNs, a completely different wound system - and that's just the tip of the iceberg. Though for the record, I was actually very excited about SR4, when I first heard about it - I thought that (for example) the matrix rules were too complex (or needed an alternate simplified mechanic) the magic rules too binary (characters either ended up shrugging off spells or being dead meat, depending on how they were designed, and God help you if you didn't get your Willpower to 6), and the rigging rules too clunky and unbalanced, so I loved the idea of a new edition... until it became clear they were throwing all the rules out the window, including the ones I really liked. On top of it all, rather than come up with something new, they settled on a core mechanic that was almost an exact copy of the old WoD rules - except using d6s instead of d10s. The only thing they kept (and actually made worse) was my least favorite aspect of the old system - the need to roll stupidly large (even bigger in SR4 than in SR3) amounts of d6s. At least in SR3, there was some point to it, because of the way variable TNs and success tresholds worked (even if it wasn't the most elegant system in the world), but in SR4, it's just a useless hold-over. The system could have been replaced by M&M style tresholds and opposed rolls, but they decided to stick with it to hide the fact there was nothing left of the old game anymore. Hell, when they first did PR for it, they had so few things they could list in the FAQ under "What stayed the same?", they actully put down "you still roll tons of d6s" as one of the handful of answers. (most of the others had to do with the fluff, and not the crunch, too) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Shadorun without the shadowrun rules
Top