Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Shadow Conjuration
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jens" data-source="post: 643448" data-attributes="member: 605"><p>Imo, the question is whether the replicated spell needs to be specifically described in the PHB at all?</p><p></p><p>Ie. why should it not be possible to summon a common item like a non-magical weapon or a ladder with Shadow Conjuration?</p><p></p><p>As I see it, there is no reason why it needs to be:</p><p>1- why could it not be from an accessory that is used in the game (TaB, etc.)</p><p>2- why could it not be a spell specific to the campaign world? (the FRCS book or equivalent)</p><p>2½- why could it not be a metamagic version? An Extended Mount spell is in no way more than a 3rd level spell</p><p>3- why should it be required to be from any official book at all? Shouldn't it be sufficient that the spell is used in the campaign?</p><p>4- finally, why should the 'spell' need to be described anywhere at all? Ie. why shouldn't it be able to do *anything* that a 3rd level conjuration spell would be able to do if it was researched? The caster is, after all, weaving shadowstuff to create the desired effect and he doesn't need to know the spell. (When Summon Monster III can summon monsters with equipment, a 3rd level conjuration spell should surely be able to conjure a non-magical sword, right?)</p><p></p><p>Of these, I think 1-2½ are fairly obvious, but some may disagree, especially with 2½. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>When I say that I can't see any reason not to allow these, I mean that I can't see any in-game reason. The spell is quite powerful if it allows spells to be spontaneously researched, so it should probably be restricted somehow. What if the max level of such spontaneous effects (ie. spell-effects the caster is not aware of a specific spell for) was 1 or 2 levels lower than the usual limit for the replicated spell itself? Then Shadow Conjuration would allow replicating yet-to-be-researched 1st/2nd level conjuration effects, such as summoning a non-magical sword for a limited duration.</p><p></p><p>Edit: 2½.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jens, post: 643448, member: 605"] Imo, the question is whether the replicated spell needs to be specifically described in the PHB at all? Ie. why should it not be possible to summon a common item like a non-magical weapon or a ladder with Shadow Conjuration? As I see it, there is no reason why it needs to be: 1- why could it not be from an accessory that is used in the game (TaB, etc.) 2- why could it not be a spell specific to the campaign world? (the FRCS book or equivalent) 2½- why could it not be a metamagic version? An Extended Mount spell is in no way more than a 3rd level spell 3- why should it be required to be from any official book at all? Shouldn't it be sufficient that the spell is used in the campaign? 4- finally, why should the 'spell' need to be described anywhere at all? Ie. why shouldn't it be able to do *anything* that a 3rd level conjuration spell would be able to do if it was researched? The caster is, after all, weaving shadowstuff to create the desired effect and he doesn't need to know the spell. (When Summon Monster III can summon monsters with equipment, a 3rd level conjuration spell should surely be able to conjure a non-magical sword, right?) Of these, I think 1-2½ are fairly obvious, but some may disagree, especially with 2½. :) When I say that I can't see any reason not to allow these, I mean that I can't see any in-game reason. The spell is quite powerful if it allows spells to be spontaneously researched, so it should probably be restricted somehow. What if the max level of such spontaneous effects (ie. spell-effects the caster is not aware of a specific spell for) was 1 or 2 levels lower than the usual limit for the replicated spell itself? Then Shadow Conjuration would allow replicating yet-to-be-researched 1st/2nd level conjuration effects, such as summoning a non-magical sword for a limited duration. Edit: 2½. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Shadow Conjuration
Top