Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Shadowdancer's Hide in plain Sight
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="UltimaGabe" data-source="post: 1937064" data-attributes="member: 16019"><p>Your logic appears to be faulty. No spell, in all of D&D, with the exception of Wish and Miracle, is open-ended. If the spell doesn't say it does something, it doesn't do it. If a spell says, "This spell causes X to occur", then that's ALL it does. Even if it provides a list of things that the spell does NOT do, that by no means say that it does everything except those in the list. True Seeing, for example, provides no clause saying, "True seeing does not cause a fireball to appear in front of the caster." Therefore, by your own apparent logic, a DM could rule that it DOES cause a fireball to appear in front of the caster, simply because it isn't included in the list of things it DOESN'T do. My point is that it provides a strict list of things it DOES do, and Hide in Plain Sight by no means qualifies as any of those. Even if it isn't included in the list of things that it DOESN'T do, that means nothing- as there's an infinite number of things not included on such a list. The spell description doesn't say it penetrates Hide in Plain Sight, and therefore, it doesn't.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Completely and totally flavor text. Game-mechanic-wise, it does not do that at all. True Seeing does not let you see things as they actually are. If a man is wearing a mundane disguise to look like a woman, the spell simply tells you there's a woman standing in front of you. The person, however, is actually a man. Why didn't True Seeing show that man as what he really was, if that's what the spell claims to do? Not only that, but you'll note that True Seeing sees through even non-magical darkness. How is that showing you things as they actually are? It's actually dark- but the spell still penetrates it. (In fact, before they introduced that feature in 3.5, my DM would always say, "Okay, you cast True Seeing. It's Truly Dark.") Therefore, that line of flavor text has no place in this discussion.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Except that nowhere does it say that True Seeing does that. If you're taking True Seeing as an open-ended spell, telling yourself "True Seeing does everything except what's listed in this description", then you're going to believe that no matter what- but it's a faulty line of logic. There's nothing hindering the spell, of course- but there's nothing compelling it either. If nothing gets it going, nothing needs to stop it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="UltimaGabe, post: 1937064, member: 16019"] Your logic appears to be faulty. No spell, in all of D&D, with the exception of Wish and Miracle, is open-ended. If the spell doesn't say it does something, it doesn't do it. If a spell says, "This spell causes X to occur", then that's ALL it does. Even if it provides a list of things that the spell does NOT do, that by no means say that it does everything except those in the list. True Seeing, for example, provides no clause saying, "True seeing does not cause a fireball to appear in front of the caster." Therefore, by your own apparent logic, a DM could rule that it DOES cause a fireball to appear in front of the caster, simply because it isn't included in the list of things it DOESN'T do. My point is that it provides a strict list of things it DOES do, and Hide in Plain Sight by no means qualifies as any of those. Even if it isn't included in the list of things that it DOESN'T do, that means nothing- as there's an infinite number of things not included on such a list. The spell description doesn't say it penetrates Hide in Plain Sight, and therefore, it doesn't. Completely and totally flavor text. Game-mechanic-wise, it does not do that at all. True Seeing does not let you see things as they actually are. If a man is wearing a mundane disguise to look like a woman, the spell simply tells you there's a woman standing in front of you. The person, however, is actually a man. Why didn't True Seeing show that man as what he really was, if that's what the spell claims to do? Not only that, but you'll note that True Seeing sees through even non-magical darkness. How is that showing you things as they actually are? It's actually dark- but the spell still penetrates it. (In fact, before they introduced that feature in 3.5, my DM would always say, "Okay, you cast True Seeing. It's Truly Dark.") Therefore, that line of flavor text has no place in this discussion. Except that nowhere does it say that True Seeing does that. If you're taking True Seeing as an open-ended spell, telling yourself "True Seeing does everything except what's listed in this description", then you're going to believe that no matter what- but it's a faulty line of logic. There's nothing hindering the spell, of course- but there's nothing compelling it either. If nothing gets it going, nothing needs to stop it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Shadowdancer's Hide in plain Sight
Top